Andrew Strauss, the England captain, felt it was "worth having a go" at an improbable run chase against South Africa yesterday before the second Investec Test petered out into a draw.
Stuart Broad took four wickets for 12 runs before the tourists declared on 258 for nine, leaving England chasing a highly unlikely 259 from 39 overs. Yet they took a calculated gamble by sending out Kevin Pietersen, whose 149 in the first-innings changed the complexion of the game, to open.
He fell in the fourth over, hooking Vernon Philander to mid-on and, while Matt Prior was also sent up the order to No.5, England effectively had to give up their pursuit once he was run out after a mix-up with Jonathan Trott. Trott and Ian Bell remained unbeaten until the close with the teams shaking hands on 130 for four after 33 overs.
"We felt it was worth having a go at it," Strauss said. "We sent in KP, who's obviously in outstanding form, to set things in action but once Matt Prior got out it was probably time to shut up shop. It was a bit of a tall chase in the first place but it was certainly worth having a go."
Pietersen, meanwhile, escalated his contractual stand-off with England by proclaiming next week's final Test at Lord's may be his last.
Pietersen held vexed negotiations with his employers at the England and Wales Cricket Board before his surprise retirement from all limited-overs international cricket was announced in June.
It seems the 32-year-old may be nearing a premature end to his Test career too, though.Pietersen followed his man-of-the-match performance at Headingley with a startling press conference in which he made it clear he may well not play beyond the final match of three against South Africa at Lord's next week.
He refused to set a deadline for a breakthrough in negotiations, or a settlement of "other issues" in the England dressing room.
Asked if the Lord's Test could be his last, the South Africa-born batsman admitted: "Anything's possible."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article