England sauntered to an eight-wicket win over West Indies at The Oval, on the back of a century from Alastair Cook, to wrap up the NatWest Series a match early.
Cook (112) shared a century opening stand with Ian Bell (53) and then put on 81 for the second wicket with Jonathan Trott as England raced past West Indies' patchy 238 for nine with five overs to spare to establish an unassailable 2-0 lead.
The hard work was done, though, when Cook's bowling attack withstood an early barrage from Chris Gayle (53) and restricted the Windies to an under-par total despite a worthy 77 from Dwayne Bravo.
On a typically reliable batting surface of even pace and bounce, Cook and Bell then duly put England's achievable target into context.
There was barely a false shot from either as Cook won the race to 50, until Bell forewent the chance of his own second successive ton by pushing a change of pace from Darren Sammy straight into the hands of cover.
Cook made no mistake, until he lobbed a cutter from Sammy over the bowler to be caught at mid-on, as he extended an enviable sequence of six centuries from an England opener in consecutive one-day internationals – a series he began himself with back-to-back hundreds against Pakistan in Abu Dhabi.
Unsurprisingly, six wins have resulted, Cook underpinning the latest with his fifth hundred at this level – containing 12 fours in 114 balls.
Bravo identified the dismissal of Gayle, playing in his first international match since last year's World Cup, as an obvious turning point.
He made it clear, too, that the West Indies were far from pleased with the outcome of Gayle's review, in which third umpire Kumar Dharmasena appeared to conclude that the simultaneous impact of the ball with both pad and bat vindicated the original decision.
"What confused us is they used the technology . . . and then the decision was given," he said.
"It's okay, umpires do make mistakes – that's accepted – but not when they see it after a referral and realise they've made the wrong decision and stand by it.
"It was a game-changing moment, and it was always difficult then to get a big total."
Once Gayle was gone, the momentum swung emphatically towards England.
"Obviously, the decision did not help us," added Bravo. "Chris got off to a very good start; then unfortunately the way he got out put us on the back foot.
"If the decision had gone a different way, it might have been a different ball game. We lost our way in the middle there. Pollard and I fought our way back, but we were not in a position to have the firepower to finish off the innings."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article