PETER LOVENKRANDS reckons there were positives for Rangers to take from the first Old Firm clash of the season despite the 2-0 Ibrox reverse.
Celtic ran out comfortable winners on Saturday as goals from Tom Rogic and Leigh Griffiths helped them move eight points clear of Pedro Caixinha’s side in the Premiership standings.
Rangers saw a penalty appeal waved away in the first half after Jozo Simunovic caught Alfredo Morelos, before the striker was denied by Craig Gordon after the break.
And Lovenkrands admits Celtic got the rewards for being more clinical in front of goal when it mattered most.
He said: “I think there are a lot of positive things to take from the game.
“Pedro had a game plan and it worked really well first half.
“It is hard to not let Celtic create chances in the game and they will create chances, like they did.
“But they didn’t take them in the first half and Rangers could have had a penalty.
“That aside, I think Rangers first half looked really good, created a few chances themselves.
“Second half, Celtic keep creating chances and, as the manager said himself, a mistake on the edge of the box let Celtic get the goal. Celtic didn’t make as many mistakes as Rangers did.”
Boss Caixinha made a big call before the game as he fielded Carlos Pena rather than Kenny Miller in his starting line-up.
The Mexican once again failed to impress but Lovenkrands understands why Caixinha set up the way he did to begin with.
He said: “First 45 minutes, they did have a good shape and the manager set up that way. He put the right shape out.
“But we always knew that Kenny was going to play a part, he is too important not to.
“He is a very good player, and for the dressing room he is important as well, especially around an Old Firm game. He has proven that.
“So I am not surprised that as soon as the goal went in he put Kenny on to try and help out.
“Next time, it might be different. But I did think the manager got it right first half.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel