Scotland's senior referees yesterday spoke of their "deep dissatisfaction" at the punishment handed out in the Nadir Ciftci case, branding it a betrayal of assurances given to them by the Scottish Football Association in the wake of the 2010 referees' strike.
Ciftci was banned for two matches, with one of them suspended, for manhandling the assistant referee Gavin Harris during Dundee United's League Cup meeting with Inverness Caledonian Thistle in October, after the charge sheet against the player was watered down from "seizing hold [of Harris] by the throat" during a mass brawl on the pitch, to merely "placing an open hand into the lower area of the assistant referee's throat".
Ciftci had previously had his red card in the same match downgraded to a yellow in a separate successful claim for wrongful dismissal, and made a plea for talks with the SFA on the subject at the earliest available opportunity.
In a statement, the Scottish Senior Football Referees' Association (SSFRA) reacted angrily to the SFA's verdict. They referred to the incident in November 2010, when officials from Israel, Luxembourg and Malta were called in to look after four matches after Scotland's Grade One referees withdrew their labour, ostensibly over the SFA's failure to defend them adequately amid criticism of referee Dougie McDonald in a Dundee United versus Celtic match that October.
"We feel this sends out completely the wrong message on issues surrounding the protection of match officials at all levels of the game in Scotland," said the statement. "Following a weekend of action taken by some of our members in 2010, assurances were given by the SFA that it would take very seriously the protection of referees."
A statement from the SFA criticised the SSFRA for doing their talking through the media, with the governing body also sending a copy of the judicial panel's reasons to the SSFRA chairman James Bee.
". . . It would have been befitting of a members' organisation such as the SSFRA to seek an explanation for the outcome directly, without the need for such inflammatory media comments. Notwithstanding the lack of communication, we have forwarded the reasons of the Judicial Panel to Mr Bee for his consideration."
The former Fifa list referee Stuart Dougal expressed sympathy with his ex-colleagues but said he hoped the issue could be resolved without resorting to industrial action.
"I would say the punishment certainly doesn't fit the crime," said Dougal who retired in 2009. "To miss one match for what is in effect an assault on a match official is way out of kilter with previous punishments. But in terms of following on from here I hope they're level-headed in terms of refereeing and not stepping out of line in terms of the industrial action that we saw before. I was very much a supporter of that because it was the last-chance saloon for the SFA. But hopefully it can be avoided and they will have a review . . . and see if the punishment should be increased upwards."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article