Darren Barr was restricted to an outsider's view.
Not long after Hearts returned to Edinburgh following their Europa League tie with Liverpool last Friday, two of the players travelled on to Glasgow. David Templeton and Ryan McGowan were coveted by Rangers, and the progress of their potential moves was detailed on television and social media outlets.
Despite being friends with both players, Barr could only keep up with proceedings in the same way as everybody else. Even footballers themselves are drawn to Sky Sports' coverage of the final hours of the transfer window, despite the dramas being part of their everyday lives.
The outcome prompted mixed emotions in the Hearts midfielder; disappointment at seeing Templeton depart, but relief that McGowan chose to stay. Templeton's display on his debut for Rangers on Sunday, when he scored two goals against Elgin City, seemed typical to his former team-mate.
"I wasn't at all surprised the boy's got an abundance of talent," Barr said. "On the deadline day you don't know what's going to happen. Everybody was [watching Jim White on Sky Sports]. It's good for us anyway that Ryan stayed."
Templeton's departure had prompted a bitter statement from Hearts which remarked that the player had attitude problems. Yet Barr does not recall any examples. "I just saw the attitude that he wanted to win and wanted to play all the time," he said. "Sometimes things don't go for you, but he still put his head down and worked hard. I don't see why he can't go to the very top. We just want good things for the boy."
Hearts did welcome a new signing as Templeton left, with midfielder Ryan Stevenson returning to the club from Ipswich Town. Rumours had emerged that he was close to a move to Motherwell but John McGlynn asked defender Andy Webster to help turn the player back to Tynecastle.
"I heard that he had decided to go to Motherwell," said the Hearts manager. "So I got Andy Webster to give him a call and Ryan said that was not quite the case. We worked something out."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article