Carlos Bocanegra last night expressed his desire to stay with Rangers but will wait to discover their fate before making a decision.
The USA defender will be promoted to Ibrox captain if he refuses to walk away from Rangers newco but accepts the loss of Champions League football is a huge blow to his ambitions.
"I want to stay at Rangers, I love that place," he said. "I've really grown to enjoy the atmosphere going into training every day, the city, the culture and the lifestyle there.
"I think there's a ruling coming up whether we stay in the SPL or not and after that I will really have to do some thinking and speak to the coaching staff and the other players and see what's going on and then I'll know more. I'd like to stay if everything works out. The biggest thing for me with Rangers and the biggest draw for me was Champions League football because I'd never been able to play that in my career and that was the one club competition I'd never been a part of, so the lure of playing in the Champions League with Rangers was a huge attraction."
The former Fulham defender then criticised Craig Whyte for killing the old Rangers. "It was kind of sad to see that the actions of one guy can affect so many people and can affect a nation really because Rangers are such a big institution in Scotland. So it's too bad that someone's greed can ruin so many people's lives."
Bocanegra is convinced, however, that Rangers are simply too big to die and may even have forgotten about this summer's tribulations in a few years time.
"I think the newco they went into it is called something like The Rangers PLC instead of just Rangers PLC, but the brand is so big globally and especially in Europe, it's never going to go away. The fanbase of 50,000 just doesn't go away from a name change. It's a technicality The Rangers brand will be there for ever."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article