DUNFERMLINE are not the first club in a desperate position to hope a change of manager can bring about an upturn in fortunes.
Nor will they be the last. The problem, of course, is there are no guarantees things will get any better for the East End Park side under new stewardship following the departure of Jim McIntyre last night.
The new manager bounce is a curious phenomenon. A team on a pitiful winless streak, seemingly devoid of all hope, can appoint a new face and suddenly start winning. Morale improves as results do, crowds go up and all is well in the world again.
Of course, it is not always that simple. Hibernian failed to register any sort of bounce following Colin Calderwood's after and there has been no dramatic upsurge under Pat Fenlon either. Dunfermline, four points adrift at the bottom of the Clydesdale Bank Premier League with just eight games in which to extricate themselves from the relegation berth, do not have the luxury of allowing any new manager time to settle in. They need improved results right away.
In which case, it is a fire-fighter, not a manager, they require. They may turn to Jimmy Calderwood, their former manager, who kept Kilmarnock in the top flight two years ago. Jim Jefferies is another out-of-work manager who could motivate under-performing players to raise their game quickly.
They are the types of character likely to drag the best out of players over what remains of the season. Long-term planning can begin again in the summer. The timing of the announcement of McIntyre's exit was curious, coming as it did on a Friday night ahead of a weekend when Dunfermline had no game.
With the Rangers takeover saga bubbling on, Celtic and Kilmarnock preparing for a cup final, and an Edinburgh derby looming, it was almost as if someone thought it was a good day to bury bad news.
Dunfermline took a chance on McIntyre when they appointed him as a rookie manager in 2007, stuck by him when promotion was not achieved in the first few seasons, then got their reward when he finally took them up last summer. It seemed John Yorkston, the chairman, was determined to back his young, eager manager for the long haul.
The team started well on their return to the Premier League and played some nice football along the way, prompting Yorkston to tell this newspaper in September that he almost wouldn't mind relegation back to the first division if McIntyre continued to get his team to play in such a fashion.
The bright start was to prove something of a false dawn. Results soon turned and Dunfermline, hampered by a string of serious injuries and without the budget to make the necessary squad improvements, started to slide down the table. They have yet to win at home.
A quick straw poll among Dunfermline fans suggested the support were divided over the decision to remove McIntyre. Some believe he will be no loss. They feel the football played in recent months has not been enjoyable to watch, especially the almost haphazard manner in which the team let in goals in every match, most notably from set-pieces.
McIntyre may curse his luck that his first-choice goalkeeper succumbed to serious injury and his back-up went on to concede the sort of embarrassingly soft goals normally seen on a public park. It was interesting to note that the first move of the Dunfermline regime sans McIntyre was to send Iain Turner, one of the outgoing manager's January signings, and another injury prone goalkeeper, on his way.
Backers of McIntyre regard his sacking as a rash move of little logic. They feel he was not given the necessary funds to improve his squad and, once Hibs finally started to show some semblance of improvement, relegation always looked likely.
If Dunfermline go down, they will only be the third side, after St Mirren and troubled Gretna, to survive only one season in the top flight after winning promotion. They still have time to turn around but it may require one almighty bounce to do so.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article