CHELSEA have reportedly reached an agreement with Monaco to sign striker Radamel Falcao on a season-long loan.
Reports have claimed the Barclays Premier League champions are poised to bring the Colombia international back to England following last season's unsuccessful stint with Manchester United.
The 29-year-old scored just four goals in 29 appearances for United and the club opted not to take up an option to sign the player on a permanent deal.
That recent record may not have put off Chelsea, who are on the lookout for a new forward following the departure of Didier Drogba.
Manager Jose Mourinho recently spoke of his admiration for the player - who boasted a prolific record prior to joining United - but there has been no confirmation from either club of a possible deal.
Falcao first shone in Europe with Porto, scoring 72 goals in two seasons. Another 70 followed in the proceeding two seasons after moving to Atletico Madrid.
Monaco then splashed out £50m to secure his services in 2013 and United paid a £6m fee for their one-year loan, with an option to buy for a reported £43.5m, last summer.
However, returning from a serious knee injury that ruled him out of the 2014 World Cup, Falcao was unable to rediscover his best at Old Trafford.
Yet while United manager Louis van Gaal decided Falcao did not fit the bill, Mourinho spoke positively.
As a former Porto manager, Mourinho claimed an affinity with the player and said last week: "It really hurts me that people in England believe that Falcao is the guy they saw at Manchester United. He's a player I know, one that I've followed since Atletico Madrid and if I can help Falcao arrive at his level I will do it."
Falcao is currently at the Copa America in Chile with Colombia.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article