Sir Alex Ferguson has accused Kenny Dalglish of 'burying his hand in the sand' over the Luis Suarez - Patrice Evra saga, an episode he thinks cost his compatriot the Liverpool job.
Suarez was banned for eight matches and fined £40,000 for racially abusing Manchester United defender Evra during the 1-1 draw between the two sides on October 15 2011.
Ferguson, in his autobiography which is released on Thursday, reveals how he told Evra to report the Suarez abuse to the match officials.
Liverpool players, and then manager Dalglish, leapt to Suarez's defence following the punishment and even wore t-shirts supporting the striker in the warm-up before their game against Wigan.
The following summer Dalglish was sacked, and Ferguson believes his support of Suarez was a big factor in his dismissal.
Ferguson branded the t-shirt stunt "ridiculous".
"Nobody at Liverpool seemed willing to pull Kenny's horns in," Ferguson adds.
"I felt Kenny was falling back on the old chip on his shoulder. As a manager your head can go in to the sand a bit, especially with a great player."
Ferguson questions whether Dalglish, with whom he has gone through many battles during his career, would have done the same had a reserve team player been at the centre of the issue.
There is also deep criticism of the Scot's decision to pay £20million for Stewart Downing.
Two other Liverpool managers are criticised in Ferguson's book.
Graeme Souness is described as "a good guy but impetuous".
Ferguson also lambasts Rafael Benitez for his infamous "facts" press conference.
The Spaniard reeled off a number of claims regarding Ferguson and his supposed ability to manipulate referees when the two teams were going head to head for the 2008-09 title.
The Scot thinks Benitez came across as "a silly man" and a "control freak".
"The mistake he made was to turn our rivalry personal," Ferguson said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article