Darren Fletcher insists David de Gea has nothing to reproach himself for despite making the mistake that cost Manchester United a place in the Capital One Cup final.
United were less than two minutes away from securing a Wembley date with Manchester City when De Gea allowed a weak Phil Bardsley shot to slip through his fingers.
Though the hosts responded immediately through Javier Hernandez, it was only enough to send the tie into a penalty shoot-out, which ended in farce as only Fletcher was successful from United's five kicks, allowing Sunderland to scrape through.
It was yet another dismal night for manager David Moyes.
However, for De Gea, Fletcher does not believe there is any blame attached.
"David will be fine," the Scotland midfielder said.
"He has been fantastic for us. There has not been a better goalkeeper around for the last 18 months.
"He has been one of the most positive things about this season.
"He is disappointed but all goalkeepers make mistakes and he will show what a top goalkeeper he is."
Fletcher believed De Gea atoned for his error by making a key shoot-out contribution, in particular denying Adam Johnson with the kick that would have won the game for Sunderland.
Unfortunately for the hosts, it just proved to be the prelude for more misery as Rafael failed from the spot, just as Danny Welbeck, Adnan Januzaj and Phil Jones had done beforehand.
"Penalties are a lottery but we should still be disappointed with our execution of them," said Fletcher.
"We had the momentum going into the penalties but it didn't pan out the way I thought.
"At Old Trafford, to only score one is disappointing, there is no denying that."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article