ADMINISTRATORS at Rangers hit back last night at claims they were dragging their heels over the appointment of a preferred bidder for the club.
Paul Murray, of the Blue Knights consortium, was quoted in one newspaper yesterday speaking of his fears that the decision to facilitate the request from Singapore-based businessman Bill Ng and American tycoon Bill Miller for further information from the SPL over the potential future sanctions for insolvent clubs which will come on board from May 14 was pushing the club ever closer towards liquidation.
Murray still feels it is achievable to avoid these newly-introduced penalties by agreeing a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) with creditors before the start of next season, but Paul Clark, of Duff & Phelps, insisted that they weren't to blame for the hold-up.
"We saw the comments from one bidder in the media on Saturday, but it is not us who are holding up the process or moving the goalposts and all the bidders are aware of that," Clark said.
"We believed we were nearly there last week and it is unfortunate that matters have run on. We are driving the process as quickly as we can."
Meanwhile, Murray admitted last night that assets such as Ibrox and Murray Park would become "vulnerable" in the event of full-blown liquidation, but stressed that needn't be the case in the event of Rangers starting up as a so-called newco.
"Liquidation isn't necessarily the same as a newco which is bidding for the assets of the football club," Murray said. "That is when someone is offering to buy the trade and assets of the football club, but still run it as a football club. They are not going to shut the place down."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article