THE fervent celebrations of the Dundee supporters were understandable, given the manner in which their emotions had been wrought during the previous half hour.
Events elsewhere conspired to condemn their side to relegation twice before the serenity that had settled upon this contest was disturbed by a raucous roar; news had filtered through that Leigh Griffiths, a former Dens Park darling, had scored a late equaliser at Easter Road to deny St Mirren victory. The goal meant that Dundee's lingering tenancy of the Clydesdale Bank Premier League will be prolonged for yet another week but, for those affiliated to the division's bottom side, it was a strike which seemed to carry even greater significance.
Emboldened by their resilience and high on the adrenaline of the occasion, it was possible on Saturday evening to detect a genuine belief among them that a remarkable resurrection is not just possible, but entirely realistic. John Brown's crude comments about the stench of fear emitted by St Mirren evinced that conviction; so, too, did the assessment of defender Brian Easton, who strayed towards the notion that he would rather be in Dundee's position than that of St Mirren. Indeed, of all the qualities Brown has injected into this hitherto hapless squad, that confidence is perhaps the most telling.
It is, however, desperately misguided. St Mirren's draw was celebrated at Dens given the immediate consequences but, in fact, the point earned by the Paisley side is probably the one that confirms their own top-flight status.
Eight points now separate the teams with just three games left, but the insurmountable goal difference advantage held by Danny Lennon's side effectively widens that gap to nine. Indeed, should they avoid defeat against Hearts at Tynecastle on Saturday, St Mirren would ensure their safety even before Dundee take the pitch against Aberdeen the following afternoon.
Easton, though, was not prepared to accept that eventuality as a given. "If I was in the St Mirren team I'd be nervous," he insisted. "The longer this goes on, the more nervous they'll become. We have got the momentum and are winning games and they are not."
Such resolve is admirable from a club that, lest we forget, has previous for refusing to roll over and die despite going into administration twice before and being punished with a 25-point deduction which left them on the brink of second division football just a couple of years ago. Yet still it smacks of too little, too late, even if Brown has now steered them to four wins in eight league matches.
The loss of Gary Harkins with a cracked rib is significant, the playmaker now is unlikely to be available for the remainder of the campaign, leaving the energetic but uninspiring John Baird and Carl Finnigan with the responsibility in attack and the inconsistent Jim McAlister and Ryan Conroy tasked with cleaving open defences. On Saturday, they struggled to do so as Dundee were stymied by familiar failings; a lack of quality in midfield and not enough composure in the final third combining to ensure a fraught afternoon despite the dismissal of Andy Webster.
The Hearts defender lasted just half an hour, having been so piqued by the presence of Finnigan that he earned two yellow cards for excessive instances of brutality against the striker. The latter caution was perhaps open to debate, though, the centre-back having been judged to have led with an arm in an aerial joust. "It changed the game," said defender Jamie Hamill.
Regardless, the sending off neutered the visitors, who lacked the impetus of Dundee. That is perhaps understandable, given their season is wending towards a conclusion, but several members of the squad – including Webster and Kevin McHattie and Darren Barr – are out of contract in the summer so are playing to impress manager Gary Locke or, in Barr's case, suitors elsewhere.
The club's recent run of form, eight defeats in 12 matches in all competitions, will not help their cause. However, enhancing that record with a victory over St Mirren on Saturday will, at least, give Dundee further cause to celebrate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article