DUNDEE yesterday stunned Scottish football and sparked division among their own supporters by appointing John Brown as the club's interim manager until the end of the season.
The 51-year-old, who replaces the sacked Barry Smith, is a legend at Dens Park from his playing days during the 1980s, but has been out of senior football management since leaving Clyde in November 2009.
Brown, a member of Rangers nine-in-a-row side, has a ready-made assistant in his former team-mate Ray Farningham and will be watching his new side from the stands at today's televised Clydesdale Bank Premier League meeting with Celtic at Parkhead.
Brown, who could become a contender for the role on a permanent basis, clearly impressed chief executive Scot Gardiner and the majority of a fan-led board during a swift interview process, which was also thought to include former Aberdeen manager Jimmy Calderwood and ex-St mirren chief Gus McPherson, but there was a chaotic response to his appointment among the club's rank-and-file last night.
Amid claims that the supporters representatives who comprise 55% of the board had exceeded their authority, social networking sites were rife with talk of an extraordinary general meeting of supporters groups and rumours that Brown had even instantly resigned.
Brown inherits a side rooted to the bottom of the SPL, but faces a William Hill Scottish Cup quarter-final against city rivals United in seven days' time.
That spell at Clyde, which saw the club's First Division status being preserved in his first year before Brown was sacked halfway through the next campaign, is his only previous senior managerial experience.
Brown had a role in the scouting department at Rangers and last summer launched an attempt to take control of the club.
"Having met with members of the Board and CEO Scot Gardiner this week, his passion for Dundee was evident," a club statement read. "His willingness to step up to the plate for the rest of the season alongside his immediate understanding of what we as a club need from the position convinced us he is the man to address the challenges ahead of us this season."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article