Samuel Eto'o has laughed off the leaked remarks from Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho questioning his age, joking that if he can manage a hat-trick against Manchester United "at 37" he must have plenty of years left in the tank.
On Wednesday evening, the Blues secured a 1-1 draw in their Champions League last-16 first-leg with Galatasaray. The build-up to the match was dominated by comments made in private by the Portuguese concerning his strikers, in particular Eto'o.
Canal Plus broadcast video of Mourinho telling a businessman at a recent sponsor's event: "The problem with Chelsea is I lack a striker. Eto'o is 32 years old, maybe 35, who knows?"
Mourinho was apoplectic about the remarks being broadcast and said his relationship with Eto'o had not been affected - something the Cameroon forward agrees with after he made light of the comments.
"I am Samuel Eto'o, what can I say?" he said after the Galatasaray match.
"If at 36 and 37 I can score three goals at Manchester United it means that I still have some juice and I can even score until I am 50.
"But I really don't care, what is really important to me is to give my maximum to the team, to help them to win some titles."
Eto'o came on as a 68th-minute substitute in Turkey for Fernando Torres, whose goal early in the clash was the ideal response to Mourinho's leaked remarks.
Demba Ba, the other striker in the squad, did not get off the bench but insists there are no issues with the Chelsea manager.
"I am feeling good," he said.
"The relationship is okay - there is nothing exciting to tell you.
"I just keep smiling, keep fighting, keep training well and things will come.
"That's probably the way he thinks; I have my way to think as well and - nothing special - I don't have an issue with anyone."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article