Rangers fans are to be polled on whether they want the team to be housed in the first division next season or the third division.
For many of them, it is the first time they have been able to articulate their own view of what should happen to the club as a penalty for the reckless financial mismanagement that led to administration and, some time in the coming years, liquidation of The Rangers Football Club plc.
A grassroots campaign among ordinary supporters of other clubs led to SPL chairmen being unable to think only of the financial implications of denying newco Rangers entry into the top flight. A compromise solution, involving Rangers playing in the first division next season while reducing the losses incurred by the clubs they leave behind, is now being lobbied for by the SFA, the SPL and the Scottish Football League.
But some Rangers supporters would prefer that the club moves to the third division and climbs its way back up the leagues. There is a certain appeal to the notion of absolving themselves from the sins of the past two owners, and the club could never be accused of not being punished. But is it a case of the heart ruling the head, or an attempt to regain control over the destiny of their own club?
The poll, being run by the Rangers Fans Fighting Fund in co-operation with the club, will go some way to revealing the mood of the Ibrox support. It is clear enough what the rest of Scottish football supporters think, with the No To Newco campaign now spreading into the first division. Chairmen there will still listen to the concerns of the people who effectively pay their wages and remain the lifeblood of their clubs, so it cannot be taken for granted that the compromise solution takes effect.
No clear evidence has been provided to reveal the true cost to Scottish football of Rangers moving to the third division. A document sent out to all SFL clubs yesterday said that £16m would be taken out of the game as a consequence of this, with Sky and other commercial partners looking to reduce their financial input if Rangers are no longer in the top flight. But the figure is not broken down or explained, so any analysis of what is best for Scottish football has to be subjective. So, too, does the response of Rangers fans.
The Ibrox support has grown weary of being helpless. They cannot protest at the consequences of the damage wreaked by Sir David Murray and Craig Whyte, but nor do they feel directly responsible. The only way to regain control is to push for a move to the third division, so that no rivals can complain that a situation was engineered to make life easier for them.
There will be a certain romance to the campaign to climb back through the leagues, and a hardcore of the support will continue to follow the club as diligently as before. Crowds will falter, though, and setbacks will feel debilitating. At least three seasons out of the top flight will also feel like a long time in the wilderness for fans – and a club – who have become used to measuring success in major trophies and appearances in the Champions League.
In effect, though, it is going back to basics. It would be a story of redemption, although for some fans there is also an element of striking back in their willingness to reject the compromise solution. The SPL clubs know, even if it has been publicly quantified and accounted for, that they will lose significant amounts of money if Rangers are no longer in the top flight.Putting the Ibrox side in the first division would lessen the blow, and limit it to one year, probably. But Rangers fans feel that the club is being manipulated to suit others.
The No To Newco movement would agree. They still want Rangers put in the third division, as a form of justice, even if it does damage Scottish football in the meantime. Perhaps the game does just need to suffer this moment of crisis, and the consequences, if it is not to suffer a lingering malaise. The same could be said of Rangers, and perhaps explains why the long, slow climb back up to the top is the better route for them, too.
It is, in truth, the only way for the club and its fans to truly put this crisis behind them.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article