A court hearing in Lithuania which could prove crucial to Hearts' hopes of escaping administration has been delayed for a second time.
The hearing to appoint a bankruptcy administrator to the club's 50 per cent shareholder UBIG was due to take place on Monday after being postponed on Friday.
However, the judge hearing the case has been seconded to another matter and the hearing has been pushed back a further 24 hours.
Hearts cannot complete a pence-in-the-pound Company Voluntary Arrangement with their creditors and exit administration until UBIG has appointed its own administrator.
But even if the case is heard on Tuesday, the name of the administrator could take another 30 days to be revealed by the court.
Hearts' administrator Bryan Jackson claimed on Friday, however, that the initial postponement ''changed nothing'' in relation to his attempts to save the club.
Jackson was given the go-ahead to start the CVA process last week by the administrator of Ukio Bankas, another firm once controlled by former club owner Vladimir Romanov which has also been declared insolvent.
Ukio Bankas, which owns 29.9 per cent of the club and holds a floating charge on the stadium, and UBIG are owed around £24million.
BDO, the firm handling Hearts' administration, has appointed fans' group the Foundation of Hearts but it must now wait for the UBIG situation to be resolved before it can finalise its deal.
A post of the FoH official Twitter site confirmed the postponement. It said: "UBIG court case now set for tomorrow, when the hope is the judge overseeing case will be available to preside."
Hearts lost 2-0 to Kilmarnock on Saturday to leave them 15 points behind St Mirren at the bottom of the Scottish Premiership.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article