If Liverpool needed any reminder how tough life will be without last season's two leading goalscorers, it was provided by Aston Villa.
Paul Lambert's side grabbed an early lead in the Barclays Premier League match through Gabriel Agbonlahor and then clung on for a 1-0 success as their hosts struggled to create clear-cut chances.
Stand-in captain Agbonlahor hailed a resolute defensive effort as Aston Villa once again came away from Anfield with an upset.
He said: "We came here with tactics to frustrate Liverpool and try and nick a goal, and they came off perfectly for us."
Agbonlahor's goal capped a superb week for the Villa frontman, who signed a new four-year deal with the club on Wednesday.
"It wasn't the best of goals but I think you take them in the Premier League when they come. It's nice to top off a really good week for me," he said.
With Daniel Sturridge sidelined for up to three weeks with a thigh injury - for which manager Brendan Rodgers has still not forgiven England - it meant Liverpool started a game without him or Luis Suarez, a summer departure to Barcelona, for the first time since December 2012.
Last season the pair scored 56 league goals between them so it was immediately apparent where the Reds were most likely to be under the greatest strain.
Liverpool boss Brendan Rodgers was left to rue that lack of killer instinct in the final third as they had 18 shots at goal but just one on target as they suffered their second league defeat of the campaign.
"We started slowly in the game and only probably only started to click and up the tempo when we went 1-0 behind," said the Northern Irishman, who left talismanic Raheem Sterling on the bench.
"I think the players gave everything. It was a bit of mixture, we couldn't find that quality in the final third of the field and Aston Villa defended well.
"We just couldn't find the final pass, we had enough of the ball, but we just couldn't create so much."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article