This is how the season ends, not with a bang but a whimper.
The refrain adapted from The Hollow Men was likely to sound empty to Liverpool fans and their players following their scuppered title bid this season, but they might well have derived more comfort from it than the words of an erstwhile rival: football, bloody hell.
The Barclays Premier League table yesterday accounted for how close the Anfield side came to securing its first title in 25 years, with champions Manchester City just two points ahead of them. The trophy would still feel miles away, though, since it was delivered instead to the Etihad Stadium.
Anfield held its breath yesterday as Newcastle were dismissed nervously, only for confirmation to arrive swiftly that City had won too. Goals in the second half from Daniel Agger and Daniel Sturridge - which cancelled out an early own goal from Martin Sktrel - were made insignificant.
Liverpool had led the title race for the majority of the campaign, only to slip up on the home straight. An air of dejection choked Merseyside yesterday as a result but this has been a campaign worthy of some positive reflection. There is the Champions League to look forward to, after all.
"My overriding feeling at the moment is one of sheer pride for the players," said Brendan Rodgers, the Liverpool manager. "We have finished the season winning 12 games out of 14, drew one and lost one. So the players have shown an incredible level of consistency and quality in that period.
"We would prefer to finish top but we finished just behind and that's a great mark of the progress we've made this season. The goal is to try to win the title next year."
Steven Gerrard, the Liverpool captain, had delivered a passionate speech to his team-mates earlier in the campaign to help inspire their title charge. He spoke more calmly at Anfield but still made his point clear.
"We can't be too down," he said. "It's been a fantastic season and we need to bounce back next year and go one better. There's a lot of ability in the squad."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article