LIVINGSTON chairman Gordon McDougall's position was last night under threat after it emerged that he is considering his options to recover money due to him.
Despite being the driving force on the board of the troubled West Lothian outfit, it is believed that McDougall's relationship with those pulling the purse strings at Livingston has completely broken down.
Neil Rankine had been the Lions' principle shareholder until Wednesday when it was claimed that he handed over his 50 per cent stake to former director Robert Wilson, Neil Hogarth and Graham Leslie.
Businessman Rankine had been ordered to sell either his stake in Livingston or East Fife by the Scottish FA after being found guilty of breaching dual ownership rules.
News that the respected McDougall, who is believed to be due a five-figure sum, is being pushed out by the new owners is sure to concern the club's fans and the SFA.
McDougall has not officially given up his title as chairman and is currently on holiday but it is believed he has told those running the club that he will not return to his day-to-day duties under the current regime unless an agreement can be reached over payment of what he is due.
Livingston remain under a blanket signing ban which prohibits manager Mark Burchill from tying down existing players on fresh contracts.
As it stands, the Championship outfit only have three players signed up for next season and it remains to be seen whether SFA compliance officer Tony McGlennan is satisfied by Rankine's share transfer.
Livingston have endured a year of off-field woe after being fined £10,000 and docked five points by the Scottish Professional Football League last November of breaking tax rules.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article