THE word loan may be a dirty word around the halls of Ibrox Stadium right now given the current stand-off with Mike Ashley, and yet borrowing players rather than money from other club owners does seem to be a way to move forward.
Mark Warburton used the loan system to his considerable advantage last season when he had five such players on the books at Brentford at any one time. It would not be outrageous to suggest the new Rangers manager will look to similar short-term deals over the next few weeks.
He won't be the only one. In recent years, many English-based players have taken the risk, and that is what many view it as, and made a temporary move to Scottish football for some much-needed game time.
Celtic won the lottery with Jason Denyaer and Fraser Forster, the two in different ways being the best examples possible of a loan deal coming good. Then there was the Newcastle United pair of Paul Dummett and Connor Newton who helped St Mirren win the League Cup.
And while Newcastle is another word you can only whisper in Govan, the goals of Haris Vuckic at least gave Rangers a chance of promotion; although it's hard to utterly forget the nothing contribution offered by the other four from St James' Park.
It should be an almost perfect system. Player A in England can't get a game. Club in Scotland offers him at least half a season of regular football which they would never get stuck in the reserves with a late substitute appearance in a nothing cup game being their best hope of getting on the pitch.
Like the ones mentioned above, the player does well and goes back to his parent club much improved. Dummett, for example, has been a regular with Newcastle since his time at St Mirren.
But what Warburton may find is that persuading decently paid young players on a move north, even if they are not close to the first-team, is not without its difficulties.
Gus MacPherson, the Queen's Park manager, was left frustrated many times during his years at St Mirren when several players turned down his offer of a loan deal, preferring to stay where they were, picking up a wage for not playing football.
"What I will say is that good players want to play and the lads who come up here tend to turn out well because of that," said MacPherson. "It is so much better for a player to get completive football than staying with the development squad.
"One of the problems I faced over the years with St Mirren was because the loan was cross border, meaning the player had to stay at least from August to December, and quite a few didn't fancy that. They preferred to stay in England, move away from their club for just a month or so, which they could do, and then they wouldn't feel that they were literally miles away from the first-team.
"Clubs would love to send their players up here. It's just some of the players would say no. I have never really understood that, although I believe it's a little bit easier than a few years ago since less young players are getting their chance at the biggest club."
Another manager, who spent many years in the top flight, believes a problem is that too many young players in England see the game here was some sort of wasteland.
"They don't rate it and think they are too good for up here," he told me. "You can ask some kid who hasn't played a game for the first-team to come up for a season, and I'm talking League One here, that you could give him a platform and he'd enjoy playing in a good quality league.
"But they get paid too much when they haven't done anything and would prefer to stay put. It's the wrong decision."
Nobody wants to see the Scottish Premiership and the Championship chock full of loans. However, as MacPherson said, the good guys want to play and play anywhere.
"I was 19 at Rangers and John Mc Gregor asked me if I wanted to go to Exeter City on loan," he said. "I told him yes. I had no hesitation. I just wanted to play. I also had no clue where Exeter was. It was only when I got him, looked at a map and thought 'oh s***.' I still went right enough."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article