Billy Brown takes greater care in interviews these days.
The image of the East Fife manager prowling in front of camera, snarling about the abuse his players had suffered during a home defeat by Stenhousemuir last month is one which is hard to shake, not least since the footage has gained notoriety online and led to a request for an interview from Sky.
He was more relaxed yesterday, victory in a play-off with Peterhead which keeps his side in the Irn-Bru Second Division for another season and the promise of a family holiday in Majorca making him a far cuddlier character at Balmoor. Yet he still made one comment which is worth recording for posterity: "We didn't succeed, we were playing on the back of failure."
The East Fife manager spoke warmly of a narrow aggregate win over Peterhead and the goal from David Muir which supplied it, but Brown was keen that his players did not feel too pleased with themselves. After all, the campaign foundered on a run of 14 matches without a win – including that infamous defeat by Stenhousemuir – with yesterday's victory only the club's fourth this year. Muir's goal, when the defender turned in Craig Johnstone's corner three minutes into the second half, was a bright spot, but one which only stood out given that it was found in the shadows of an otherwise uncomfortable campaign.
"That [win] may be good for the spectators but it's not good to be involved in – I'd never been involved in play-offs before," said Brown. "It's a relief, really. We got one or two breaks today that we've not been getting. We didn't succeed, we were playing on the back of failure."
East Fife might have been left to spend the summer on the back of disappointment, too, with Peterhead contributing to a troublesome tie. Rory McAllister went close inside the first two minutes, Andy Rodgers' shot was cleared off the line later in the first half, while Scott Ross also hit the side netting with a low shot.
"We lacked a wee bit of quality when required," said Jim McInally, the Peterhead manager. "I'm gutted for them. To lose it in that manner was disappointing."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article