Duff & Phelps, Rangers' administrators, will send their Company Voluntary Arrangement proposal to creditors today.
Herald Sport understands Ticketus received a draft version of the document yesterday, and negotiations prompted some alterations which prevented the document being formally released last night.
The proposal outlines the extent of the pence-in-the- pound settlement offer funded by the £8.5m bid for the Ibrox club made by Charles Green's consortium.
Once creditors have received the proposal, a meeting will be held 14 days later to vote on the offer – with Duff & Phelps hoping that will be on Thursday June 14.
"The proposal will offer the best return for all stakeholders," said Paul Clark of Duff & Phelps. "If approved by the creditors, the CVA proposal will rescue the company and finally enable it to exit administration."
Herald Sport also understands that, having already paid an exclusivity fee, Green will be required to deliver the next instalment of the consortium's £8.5m purchase price on publication of the CVA document. This would be a seven-figure amount, suggesting that he has finally sourced the funds to complete the deal, despite doubts about his loose coalition of investors.
It was also confirmed yesterday that Rangers have been granted a two-week grace period by the Scottish Premier League to submit audited accounts, which are required to be granted a club licence by the SFA. The SPL board has the discretionary powers to allow a club to retain its membership of the league despite not meeting the deadline, and apply sanctions.
"The last audited accounts submitted by Rangers were to June 2010," said Jack McLaren, audit partner with Johnston Carmichael Chartered Accountants. "They maybe hadn't been completed by the time the club went into administration, but the files can certainly be finished in the additional time given."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article