RANGERS could face action from the SPFL after the league body launched a probe into the crowd trouble which marred Friday night's match with Hibernian.
Trouble flared between rival sets of fans after Scott Robertson opened the scoring during the Easter Road side's 2-0 win at Ibrox, missiles being thrown and punches being exchanged in the same corner of the ground, between the Broomloan Stand and the Sandy Jardine Stand, where there had been bother at the recent abandoned match against Hearts.
After the issue was raised at a customary debrief with the safety officers of both clubs, the Sunday Herald understands SPFL delegate Alan Dick will include the incident in his report. With only six rows of seats left between the fans, and fairly sparse stewarding in the area, the Ibrox club could face any number of sanctions in the event that they are deemed to have made inadequate provisions for the safety of spectators.
These stretch from a simple warning, to a fine, right through to the ultimate draconian sanction of a closure of part of the ground, although this last outcome is highly unlikely and would be deemed a drastic overreaction. Hibs are also responsible for the action of their fans.
If, however, the investigation - which will take into account CCTV footage of the incidents, and statements from the match commander and both clubs - finds that all the appropriate actions were taken then no further action will be required. This follows a three stage process - firstly in preparation for the match, in dealing with the incident when it occurred and whether the culprits were weeded out satisfactorarily afterwards.
With more than 500 people staging a protest against the current Ibrox board prior to the match, which saw Hibs overtake Ibrox into second place in the Championship, Hibs officials are also thought to have encountered difficulties entering and exiting the stadium. While the incident may be used to highlight the dangers of playing top flight football in Scotland on Friday evenings, in general the response from the authorities to these matches is thought to be favourable.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article