It may be that the most prominent act of Malcolm Murray's time at Ibrox is his departure.
He has been a low-key Rangers chairman, with fewer and fewer public appearances and statements during the course of recent months, but the decision by the board of directors to ask him to stand down in the best interests of the club suddenly returns Murray to the centre of attention.
It is not a place he finds comfortable. Murray does not talk to journalists, other than set-piece interviews, of which he has carried out very few, and he is steeped in the tradition of Rangers being a club that retains a dignified silence about its affairs.
In many ways, he should have been an archetypal Rangers chairman, with a long career in business and finance, and a lifetime of being a fan of the club.
However, concerns, raised by two supporters, about his personal conduct appear to have brought his chairmanship to the brink.
The decision to ask him to step down was taken by the board of directors. There have long been rumours of tensions between Murray and Charles Green, and they are certainly contrasting characters.
Green has spent much of his time as chief executive engaging with supporters and, at times, the media, with few subjects left unaddressed.
There is a bullishness and sense of purpose about Green, even if he might admit himself that, on occasion, he says a little too much. That is his nature; he is unabashed and supporters have welcomed the presence of a high-profile chief executive prepared to fight the club’s cause.
Murray might favour a more subdued, less assertive style, but Green had wary fans to win over and a club whose sense of identity and position in the Scottish game had to be restored.
Whatever personal animosity lay between the two men has been managed up until now, but it was clear enough that Murray's time as chairman would come to an end sooner rather than later.
This leaves Rangers in an awkward position, since the view of the directors was that the club would be best served by an orderly transition. That seems unlikely now.
Murray's private life had been raised in previous board meetings, but a second complaint by a fan led to him being asked to step down by the board last week.
There is acknowledgement of his contribution to the club, during the takeover saga last year then during the Initial Public Offering of shares last December, although figures within Ibrox are thought to be incredulous at the notion that the success of the IPO, which raised £22m, was due to Murray.
The chairman has contacts in the city of London and arranged a handful of investor meetings with institutions, but the marketing roadshows were carried out by Green and Brian Stockbridge, the finance director.
It is, none the less, an untidy state of affairs for Rangers, one that will irk shareholders and the business community, particularly with the interim financial results due next month.
"Charles Green has done a good job, with the really driving ahead bluster," said Jim McColl, the leading businessman and a member of the consortium that tried to buy the club from Green last May.
"You probably need a different kind of approach now. I am sure that [Malcolm] Murray is providing that."
Yet Murray has been a low-key chairman. Rangers cannot continue to act as though faced with an array of battles to be fought, but league reconstruction, the SPL commission investigating whether or not Rangers’ use of Employee Benefit Trusts constituted a breach of registration rules, and even the topic of cross-border competitions, have been seen as issues that needed forceful responses.
A period of calm can follow, although not before the issue of Murray’s chairmanship is dealt with.
Since Murray was in place before the IPO, his appointment has not been voted on by shareholders. That would happen at the annual general meeting, but in the meantime he can be sacked. There is, though, no enthusiasm for taking this action.
Rangers are attempting to rebuild and move forward from last year's financial crisis. It is an unhelpful complication that the current chairman is unlikely to continue that journey, and one that is an issue for Rangers.
Supporters are still bruised by the Craig Whyte regime, and the departure of Murray, a long-term and committed Ibrox supporter, will trouble those who still doubt Green. Despite his low profile, Murray was considered by fans as one of their own.
Murray, like the other non-executive directors, has responsibilities to ensure proper corporate governance. With the interim results due out and the successful listing on the stock market, the club should be celebrating its return to a solid footing.
Dealing with Murray's situation and, in all likelihood appointing a new chairman who has the confidence of the support and the business community, will need to be swiftly resolved.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article