Neil Lennon saluted the "best football' his team had played under his reign as Celtic stretched their lead to 19 points in the Clydesdale Bank Premier League despite drawing 1-1 with St Johnstone at McDiarmid Park last night.
A first-half goal by Efe Ambrose was nullified by a magnificent strike by Nigel Hasselbaink with eight minutes remaining but the Celtic manager's frustration was alleviated by his satisfaction at his side's performance, particularly in the first half.
"That first 45 minutes is the best football I have seen in my time here. On a gluepot of the pitch the football, the pace, the movement was exceptional," he said.
He added: "It is a travesty we have not won the game because on that first 45 minutes we could have won two games. We cut them open at will. I am sitting here scratching my head as to why we did not win the game."
Lennon said Celtic had "looked a quality side" and praised the performance of St Johnstone goalkeeper Alan Mannus who made excellent saves, particularly from Gary Hooper and Lassad Nouioui.
"We should have been out of sight but I am not too disappointed," said Lennon. "Motherwell have lost tonight so we have gained a point."
Steve Lomas, the St Johnstone manager, admitted: "The game could have been well and truly over after 30 minutes bit for four or five great saves."
He agreed the introduction of Gregory Tade and Hasselbaink had changed the match but said of the equaliser: "I thought we were well worth it."
He declined to criticise officials over the ruling out of Frazer Wright's second-half header for offside. However, the defender said: "I was two yards onside. They have said Tade was interfering with play. I feel a wee bit hard done by but it is a hard job the officials have. Celtic were all over us in the first half and big Alan has kept us in the game and when it is 1-0 you have a chance."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article