A 21-year-old American named Jordan came from behind in a contest that had kindled memories of Bobby Jones’ achievements to win, after the closest ever battles for it, one of golf’s most famous prizes at the Open Championship yesterday.
That it was not one named Spieth, who had been seeking to claim the modern version of the Grand Slam achieved by the last amateur to win the event but was, instead, Jordan Niebrugge represented an extraordinary coincidence given the parallel with the main competition.
Setting off three behind Paul Dunne, he surely benefited from the pressure heaped upon his rival as the Irishman - another product of the American college system - woke up, if he slept at all, to headlines pointing out that he was the first amateur since the great Jones, 88 years earlier, to lead the Open after 54 holes.
Dunne’s attempted approach at the opening hole which came up short of the Swilcan Burn and betrayed his frazzled state installed made Niebrugge, three groups ahead and starting solidly, favourite to win the silver medal, but there was much to do.
Compatriot Oliver Schniederjans had already posted a five-under-par 67 to finish on nine-under, while Englishman Ashley Chesters had set out with six birdies by the 10th, to get to 11-under before a double bogey at the 15th wrecked his bid.
A hat-trick of birdies from the fourth meanwhile gave Niebrugge control and another at the long 14th meant he could afford to drop shots at the 15th and 17th holes and still coast in.
“I would rank it for sure the top accomplishment I've had so far,” he said afterwards.
“There’s nothing like coming down that last hole. It's just an awesome amphitheatre with people all around you. I was a little nervous, but it's just amazing just to walk down there.”
There were generous words, too, for fellow amateur Dunne who had ultimately also finished behind both Schniederjans and Chesters.
“He's up there with the best of them,” said the silver medallist, who agreed with his fellow Jordan’s contention of the previous day that an amateur could win a major in the next few years.
Whether that is so, or this was something of a blip given that this prize was not awarded last year, nor two years previously because no-one from the unpaid ranks made the cut, remains to be seen.
This time, though, Romain Langasque, the Frenchman who won the Amateur Championship earlier this season found himself, after four creditable rounds, a distant fifth in this contest within a contest, having beaten 88 of the 147 professionals who began this event.
Chesters got closer and at one stage in his final round had a chance to lead.
“I looked at the scoreboard on the 10th and I actually had an eagle putt and saw that was to tie me for the lead. It's crazy to think I could have had a putt to lead The Open on the final day,” he said.
That yet another young Englishman offered evidence of potentially having the capacity to step to this level was, given the excitement generated the previous weekend when they beat an England team which included Chesters on their way to winning their European Team Championship, chastening for the domestic game with no Scottish amateurs involved here.
So, too, for the amateur game as a whole, was the message delivered by Graeme McDowell when the former US Open champion was asked whether he felt fellow Irishman Dunne - who is considering whether, like Schniederjans, to turn professional immediately - should carry the momentum generated by this performance into the professional ranks rather than contest the venerated Walker Cup.
“If he has a good finish why does he have to wait for the Walker Cup?” he asked, rhetorically.
“Listen, Walker Cup is one of the fondest memories of my career but it means nothing when you press the professional button.
“He needs starts and this could give him an opportunity to get his European Tour card. Those extra six or seven weeks could be very beneficial.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article