RICKIE FOWLER hopes to complete an American clean-sweep of golf's biggest events for the first time since 1982 by winning the US PGA Championship this week.
With Jordan Spieth winning the Masters and US Open and Zach Johnson victorious in the Open Championship at St Andrews, Fowler is among the home players hoping to cement US dominance at Whistling Straits.
And although Fowler saw how difficult it is to win majors when he finished in the top five in all four in 2014, the 26-year-old is looking to adopt the same approach as 18-time major winner Jack Nicklaus.
Nicklaus felt half the players in each major were too scared to win, while other players ruled themselves out by complaining about the tough conditions.
"I don't know if I would say it's harder, by any means. There's just fewer chances at playing in majors and winning," said Fowler, who won the Players Championship and Scottish Open earlier this season.
"I looked at what Jack said in saying that they're the easiest to win. I'm trying to go with that outlook and go out there and just focus on sticking to my game plan and taking care of the business that I need to take care of out there. And ultimately putting myself in a position going into the weekend to be in contention.
"So I don't look at them as any harder to win, you just really have to be patient and not push any harder than needed."
Europe's Ryder Cup captain Darren Clarke insists the current American dominance is not a cause for concern ahead of the 2016 contest at Hazeltine, but added: "If you ask me the same question at this time next year, then I may be a little more concerned.
"But it does not make our task any more daunting. It's a very, very tough task that we have in front of us regardless. There's a new breed of American players coming through, highlighted by Jordan Spieth, obviously.
"For us to be the away team on American soil, we're under no illusions how hard it's going to be. But thankfully I'm of the opinion that we're going to have a very strong European team as well, which will only make it be a wonderful event. But we would be the underdogs as it stands right now."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here