DARREN Clarke believes he leaves the Ryder Cup team in good shape despite Europe suffering their heaviest defeat for 35 years at Hazeltine.
Clarke's side needed to overturn a three-point deficit in Sunday's 12 singles matches to claim an unprecedented fourth straight win in the biennial contest.
But although they won three of the first five matches convincingly, Patrick Reed edged a highly-charged opening contest with Rory McIlroy to strike a major psychological blow from which the holders never looked likely to recover.
Read more: No Houdini act at Hazeltine as USA win the Ryder Cup
Wins for Rickie Fowler, Brooks Koepka, Brandt Snedeker and Ryan Moore took the home side over the winning line and the final score of 17-11 was the biggest winning margin for the United States since a team containing the likes of Jack Nicklaus, Lee Trevino, Johnny Miller, Tom Watson and Raymond Floyd won by nine points at Walton Heath in 1981.
Clarke, who invited former Ireland rugby captain Paul O'Connell to address his team at Hazeltine, said: "Paul was talking about how you play for the jersey and your number, and when he stopped playing his thing was, did he leave his number five jersey in a better state than he found it?
Read more: No Houdini act at Hazeltine as USA win the Ryder Cup
"My question is did I leave numbers one to 12 in a better state than I found them? Did I maybe share something different, did I do different things? I can't answer that, you better ask them (his players). But I know they've given their all, everything they could for the badge on the shirt.
"I think they are leaving the jersey in a better place and will be a stronger team for it when it comes to Paris (in 2018).
"You do what you feel is your best and that is what I feel I have done. I have taken advice from great leaders in different fields of performance. I took everything and used it, but unfortunately the Americans played a little bit better. That is the nature of our sport.
"You do what you do for your team. I am only there to guide them. Yes, I have put the pairings out but they know how much it is down to them. As they are disappointed for me, I am more disappointed for them."
Europe left themselves with a mountain to climb after being whitewashed in the opening foursomes session, a setback which had a major effect on Clarke's decisions.
The 48-year-old used four completely new foursomes teams on Saturday and gave rookies Andy Sullivan, Chris Wood and Matt Fitzpatrick just one game before they all lost in Sunday's singles, while McIlroy, Sergio Garcia, Henrik Stenson, Justin Rose and Thomas Pieters played all five sessions.
McIlroy admitted he ran out of steam and Clarke added: "It is not really a scenario you want to have, but unfortunately after Friday morning my hands were somewhat tied with my options.
"Consequently I had to rely on guys I felt were going to play an awful lot. I would have loved to have rested them all once but it just didn't quite happen."
As with all captains, Clarke also had to put in his pairings for Saturday's second session while the first was ongoing, with Rafa Cabrera Bello therefore left out of the fourballs after he and Sergio Garcia had recovered from four down with six to play to halve their match with Reed and Jordan Spieth.
"There's timing issues involved, but that being said it's the captains job to try and get the right pairings," Clarke added. "Having gone behind in such a fashion, then obviously I was looking towards experience to try and pull us out, as I'm sure anybody would do."
Clarke's selection of Pieters proved to be inspired as the 24-year-old Belgian claimed a record four points on his debut, but opting for experience in his other wild cards of Lee Westwood and Martin Kaymer did not pay off as they won just one point from seven matches.
Asked if Europe should copy the American system of having four wild cards in future, Clarke added: "Why would you have a knee-jerk reaction when the whole system has been doing so well? Absolutely leave it as is.
"They have been successful so far, we've come up against a very, very strong American team and they've played better than we have."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here