The BBC remains "committed" to televising the Open Championship for the next two years, despite a report claiming its current deal could end a year early.
It was confirmed by the R&A in February that Sky Sports has been awarded exclusive rights to live television coverage in a five-year deal from 2017, with the BBC offering two-hour daily highlights and live coverage on radio and online.
A report in the Observer said the BBC was considering ending its live television coverage after this year's event at St Andrews, a move which would reportedly save the corporation around £7million.
However, a BBC spokesperson told Press Association Sport: "We remain committed to our current contract with the R&A."
Sky Sports did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
High-profile players voiced their disappointment about the move to Sky, with former world number one Lee Westwood branding it an "absolute disgrace".
In an open letter published when the deal was confirmed, outgoing R&A chief executive Peter Dawson insisted "numerous factors" were taken into account and played down talk about the relationship between free-to-air viewing and participation.
Dawson said: "I recognise that this new broadcast model represents a significant change and I understand that change, particularly where it involves the BBC, is controversial.
"Numerous factors were weighed in this process such as quality of coverage, household reach, innovations in the broadcast, commercial considerations and promotion of the Open and our sport throughout the year.
"I know there are many who are concerned that the Open no longer being shown live on the BBC will lead to a reduction in participation in our sport and I wanted to take this opportunity to address this specific point.
"We have looked at this issue very carefully and believe it is not possible to make an informed case that participation is simply and directly linked to free-to-air television viewing. There is no question that free-to-air sports broadcasts generate good exposure for sport...but firm conclusions about their positive impact on participation cannot be drawn."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article