Miguel Angel Jimenez has expressed his disappointment at missing out on the Ryder Cup captaincy for 2016 and hinted his chance of the job may have gone.
Darren Clarke was the unanimous choice of the five-man selection panel when they met at Wentworth on Wednesday, being chosen ahead of Jimenez and Thomas Bjorn.
European Tour chief executive George O'Grady, who was on the panel, said Jimenez and Bjorn remained viable candidates for the captaincy in the future, but Jimenez will be well outside the age profile for recent European captains by the time of the 2018 contest.
Clarke will be 48 at Hazeltine next year, while Paul McGinley was 47 at Gleneagles and Jose Maria Olazabal 46 at Medinah. Jimenez will be 54 at Paris National, while Bjorn will be 47. The likes of Padraig Harrington and Lee Westwood could also be candidates in 2018.
"I am very happy for Darren," Jimenez said after his opening round in the Hero Indian Open. "He deserves to be the Ryder Cup captain as much as I do.
"I would love to do it one day but I am happy for Darren because he has done a lot for the Tour as well. I sent him a text last night just to say well done and that I know he will do a great job. I didn't call him because I knew he would be very busy but I wanted to say well done and that if he needs anything from me when he is captain then all he has to do is call me.
"To me the Ryder Cup is very important and I will always want to be involved in it in some way. I suppose the best way for me to be involved is by taking my clubs. You never know - maybe you will see me at the next one with my clubs."
Jimenez added in a television interview on Sky Sports 4: "It's disappointing a little bit. (I've) been there for so many years on Tour, this is my 27th season, played several Ryder Cups and been vice-captain in some other ones.
"I make a lot from the Tour all these years and I think it's a little disappointing not to be captain, but I feel happy on the other hand for Darren because Darren will do a very good job."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article