Scotland's Stephen Gallacher will have to rely on a wild card after coming up agonisingly short in his last-gasp bid to qualify automatically for the Ryder Cup.
Gallacher needed to win the Italian Open or finish joint second with just one other player to dislodge Graeme McDowell from Paul McGinley's European team for Gleneagles.
The 39-year-old carded a flawless closing 65 at Circolo Golf to give himself every opportunity, but had to settle for third place, three shots behind South African winner Hennie Otto and just a stroke adrift of good friend David Howell, who denied him with a brilliant 63.
Gallacher will hope he has done enough to earn one of European captain Paul McGinley's three wild cards, which will be announced on Tuesday. The world number 34 lives just 35 miles from Gleneagles and has recorded seven top-10 finishes there in his last 12 appearances.
"It was a tall order but I am proud of myself the way I have played," Gallacher said. "I'm delighted with 17 under, it looks just a little short but there is nothing I can do.
"When it comes down to someone else's opinion...I wanted to qualify myself just to take that away. There are four or five guys that are worthy (of a wild card) so it's just what Paul sees."
Howell, who carded an eagle on the first and seven birdies in nine holes from the seventh, said: "I really hope Stephen gets a pick because he would make a fantastic Ryder Cup player.
"It was a supreme effort and if a captain needs an example of a player in form who can play under pressure he has had it this weekend."
Gallacher began the day six shots off the lead and four adrift of second, but birdied six of the first eight holes to be out in 30, at which point he was alone in second and two shots clear of Howell and Joost Luiten.
However, while Gallacher could only pick up one more shot on the back nine, Howell birdied the 11th, 12th, 13th and 15th to edge ahead and ultimately secure his best finish since winning the Dunhill Links Championship in September last year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article