Scotland's Martin Laird is relishing the prospect of home support over the weekend after remaining high on the leaderboard in the 142nd Open Championship at Muirfield.
Laird added a 71 to his opening 70 to finish one under par and well on course for his best performance in the event after three missed cuts in succession from 2009 and a tie for 72nd at Lytham 12 months ago.
"I think it will help me more than hurt me," the 30-year-old from Glasgow said. "I probably have higher expectations for myself than everyone in the crowd. It's not something I'm really worried about.
"You can only look at it as something that can help you. They can pull you along. Even as I was struggling, you hear people shouting 'Come on' and giving you support, and that's only a good thing."
Laird could have been even higher up the leaderboard if not for dropped shots at the 14th and 17th, the three-time PGA Tour winner going to the turn in 37 with a birdie at the ninth and then adding three more in a row from the 10th.
"Overall I didn't really play that well today," admitted Laird, who carded a final round of 63 to win the Valero Texas Open earlier this year, just edging out world number two Rory McIlroy in San Antonio.
"So shooting even par shows my game is in a good spot, because I really didn't hit a good golf shot until the seventh or eighth hole today. I struggled coming out. I had a nice little hot stretch there in the middle and I held it together coming in."
Tournament officials admitted they had used "a bit more" water on the greens overnight following complaints about the conditions yesterday, but Laird revealed a change in wind direction still meant a tricky finish.
"Everyone thinks 14 and 15 downwind is going to be easy," he added. "I think it's harder right now because you can hardly hit the greens. 16 and 17 is a tough finish. The last four or five holes are really hard.
"The greens were noticeably different. At number two I had about 20 feet and left it four or five feet short. It wasn't like a foot slower, it was two or three feet slower. But I think they had to do that, otherwise by this afternoon they'd be unplayable."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article