The summing up was typically honest from a good, honest Scot.
"Matchplay can be a bit of a bugger at times; you can play great and lose, you can be rubbish and win," said Stephen Gallacher.
This was a Ryder Cup debut of mixed emotions for the 39-year-old. There was the euphoria of being part of the winning team and the sense-stirring elation of being cheered and roared at every turn. Losing heavily in his fourballs match with Ian Poulter on Friday was a sore one, though. His spirited showing against Phil Mickelson in the singles - he was four-under during a 3&1 defeat - showed what Gallacher is capable of. He was keeping esteemed company and the three-time European Tour winner is determined not to become a stranger to this intoxicating environment.
"I've heard it said that, when you play in one Ryder Cup, you never want to miss another; I understand that now," said Gallacher, who will return to action on home soil this week in the Alfred Dunhill Links Championship at St Andrews, Carnoustie and Kingsbarns but is already plotting a path to the 2016 Ryder Cup at Hazeltine.
"Sam Torrance phoned me up a couple of months back, before I'd even qualified, and he said this would be the best week of my life. And, give him his due, he was right. This gives me a massive amount of motivation now. Martin Kaymer was sitting talking to me afterwards and he said: 'How's your motivation now for Hazeltine?' I just said: 'What do you think?'"
Following his Friday reversal, Gallacher sat out the whole of Saturday's play but he was very much part of the team effort.
"Every single one of them, the players and the vice-captains, spoke to me when I was left out, they made me feel so brilliant. When you are leaving four guys out of a session, there are going to be people unhappy sitting on the sidelines. Yes, I would have loved to have been involved. But would I rather sit out and have the team win? Yeah, I would always rather the team win."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article