I can still remember watching Hillsborough unfolding on TV, the crush among the supporters.
What a lot of younger fans won't appreciate now is the conditions at football grounds in those days. Fans were penned in.
I was at Stamford Bridge a lot at that time, as I was an apprentice at Chelsea. We would train down at Heathrow and then take all the gear back to the stadium, so I was there on a daily basis. I watched a lot of games and it was scary, because of that thought you always had: what if?
We always worked at Stamford Bridge after the end of the season, too, helping to get the stadium into shape before the summer holidays. The apprentices would do jobs like cleaning the dressing rooms and painting the terracing and bits of the fences. It wasn't nice, even just standing in the place when it was empty. There was no roof over the terracing the away fans stood in.
We would go up to the middle tier of the main stand during games, where it was all-seated. But I would always look across to the terraces behind the goal, with The Shed being the one all the Chelsea fans were in. It used to be crammed full of people. I used to think 'imagine being stuck in there'. Then somebody would score and everybody would surge forward. I used to look at it and be thankful I wasn't in the middle of it.
The dangers were obvious, and then there were the perimeter fences. Chelsea were one of the first to put them up. And you always had that thought, what happens if there's a big crowd and you're stuck in there? When the fences went up, they were pointing out towards the park, with the barbed wire on the top. I thought it looked scary. This type of set-up was the reason Hillsborough happened. If the terracing had been open, the fans could all have spilled onto the park.
Back in those days, hooliganism in English football was at its worst. One of the young Chelsea players, Robert Isaac, was stabbed on his way to a game against Millwall. He walked up to The Den – at that time he was just breaking into the first team so he couldn't afford a car – and was stabbed after being approached by a group of hooligans.
The only thing that saved him was the thickness of his leather jacket, but I remember him coming into training with the big scar over his back. It was horrendous.
It was the hooligan element that caused the fences to be introduced. It was unfair, though, because there were only a few clubs that had a really bad element among their fans: West Ham, Chelsea, Millwall, clubs like that.
So the authorities put the fences up and from then on, it was only a matter of time until tragedy struck. Hillsborough, where there wasn't even a safety certificate, was a disaster waiting to happen. The Liverpool fans knew that, it's one of the reasons they chased justice for so many years.
I read and hear everybody, from managers to pundits, saying 4-4-2 is prehistoric. That's the biggest load of nonsense I've ever heard. Don't write 4-4-2 off, ever. I don't care what people say about modern football, if you get the right personnel, it works.
Sir Alex Ferguson won at lot of his trophies playing 4-4-2 and it's still one of the best systems. I know Scotland play a 4-1-4-1, but it's funny that Craig Levein's backroom staff both play 4-4-2 at their clubs, Peter Houston at Dundee United and Kenny Black at Motherwell.
The doubters who write it off don't know their football. I know plenty of managers who, if they had the right personnel, would love to play 4-4-2. I've played the lone role and I've played partnerships, and if you ask any striker, you can't beat playing a partnership. Everybody seems to be writing off 4-4-2, and that's embarrassing when one of the top teams in the world won trophy after trophy using it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article