Had it not been for his infamous headline-making "jibe" at Rangers last Friday, Peter Lawwell and Celtic might still be simmering in a controversy of a different sort.
Imagine football embracing the concept of the "living wage", eh? When this topic arose at last week's Celtic AGM it confirmed again that the green and white hoops of Glasgow are a sporting institution steeped in history, social values and, dare I say it, a degree of myth as well.
Lawwell's comment to Celtic shareholders - that the current Rangers are to the pre-liquidated Rangers what Rory Bremner is to Tony Blair - went down a predictable storm with the gathered punters.
The comment was either funny or pathetic, depending on which colours you wear round your neck. We've heard plenty hot air on the subject - I've contributed some of it myself - so let's leave it at that.
What discomfited Lawwell and his Celtic board far more was their AGM's Resolution 11, put forward by Jeanette Findlay and the Celtic Trust, urging the club to embrace the living wage for all Celtic employees, full-time or part-time.
This has been a fascinating development at Celtic, denoting a group of fans who, high-mindedly or otherwise, brought their social conscience to the fore of their club's business and demanded that the board act upon it.
The history of almost every football club is steeped in myth, and Celtic are no different. The club's origins in Brother Walfrid, the Marist brother who fed the poor of Glasgow's poverty-stricken east end in the 1880s, makes for impressive reading, even if it has sometimes been edited for effect.
The main point, though, persists. Celtic have charity and social welfare written through the club's ethos. This was the context of Findlay and the Celtic Trust's petition to the board last Friday.
Except…it is complicated. The living wage is a step up from the minimum wage in Britain, but is not legally enforceable. There is currently a £1.34 per hour difference (outside London) between the minimum wage of £6.31 and the 2013 recommended living wage of £7.65
At a time when child poverty is said to be becoming rife in Britain, and with five million workers currently being paid below the living wage recommendation, the Celtic Trust's proposal seemed both timely and typical of the often-colourful business of this football club.
Celtic, Findlay argued passionately, should take a stance on the issue. The club's most recent accounts showed a pre-tax profit of £10 million, with turnover rocketing to £76 million. In short, Celtic FC is currently very comfortable financially.
A Celtic fans' poll was conducted on the matter, with 95% of the respondents saying "yes" to the living wage, with just four percent dissenting. This represented an impressive feeling on the subject.
Nonetheless, as laudable as the proposal was, nor was it a clear black-or-white case. For one thing, as Peter Lawwell pointed out, the vast majority of Celtic employees who were paid below the living wage are part-time match day personnel - stewards, bar staff, people attending the catering stalls - working on the side to top-up their main incomes.
That won't always be the case - some of Celtic's match-day employees will be unemployed during the week. But, in the main, is there a moral onus to pay a living wage to someone who already has a main income?
I've thought about this and, mistaken or not, can't convince myself that it is a moral necessity.
What would be right - though I'm not sure if it is practicable - would be for Celtic to determine which of its match-day employees are unemployed, and guarantee them a £7.65 per hour living wage. This, though, would inevitably be interpreted as a fudge, a cop-out by the club.
Regardless, in the style of the 1970s union block votes, the Celtic board kicked out the Celtic Trust's proposal, flexing their sufficient shareholding to do so. Lawwell and Co claimed it would cost up to £500,000 a year to implement, and quoted this figure prohibitively.
Becoming a "living wage employer" is something being encouraged all over Britain today. You don't often hear about it in football, and it is to Jeanette Findlay's credit that she harangued the Celtic board on the subject.
I'm guessing that Findlay won't easily give up on it. And that Peter Lawwell will ponder it further.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article