Craig Levein cannot have long left in the Scotland job. Not at this rate of gruesome progress, and with the Tartan Army jeers ringing in his ears.
Scotland tried three different systems during the 1-1 draw against Macedonia at Hampden.
Levein committed all three of his substitutes, two of them early in the second half. And Jordan Rhodes, whom Levein unfathomably started on the bench, finally saw action after 66 minutes.
All of it failed. In drawing against a side ranked 97th in the world, on top of Saturday’s 0-0 draw with Serbia, Scotland’s 2014 World Cup campaign is already in tatters. The question now is can – or should – Levein survive in his job?
That will be a fraught discussion conducted within the walls of the Scottish FA. With two away games against Wales and Belgium just a month away, an immediate dismissal seems pointless - there will still be the hope that a miraculous turnaround can be achieved.
But Levein’s position, to this observer, looks untenable.
Two points from a possible six at home is a hopeless opening haul. “Progress, progress,” Levein has preached repeatedly to us.
But this so-called progress reminds of the Old Testament prophet who, in his disgust, said: “They keep saying ‘peace, peace’ but there is no peace in this land.”
Scotland were lucky to claim a point against the Macedonians. But for Allan McGregor, who made three fine saves, while also watching his post being thudded by Ferhan Hasani, this game would have resulted in a win for Group A’s so-called underdogs in Glasgow. Macedonia were fully worth Nikolche Noverski’s opener, plus at least one more goal.
I didn’t hang around to hear Levein’s post-match analysis. This is a brutal business in which only one currency – results – counts. In this context, the Scotland manager is failing.
Hampden was aggrieved once more that Rhodes – a goalscorer Levein has richly lauded these past 10 months – did not start. It remains a strange caution on the manager’s part on many levels.
Rhodes is no callow youth. He will be 23 in four months’ time – hardly spring-chicken territory. To hear Levein, you’d think this striker was not ready, and yet, never mind moving for £8 million over the summer, Rhodes has already started and scored for Scotland.
It beggars belief that, at home in Glasgow, and facing a team as modest as Macedonia, Scotland cannot accommodate such a player.
Having started in the usual 4-1-4-1, Levein changed Scotland to 4-3-3 then 4-4-2 in his endless search for “progress”. The best spell finally arrived when Rhodes came on for James Morrison after 66 minutes and Scotland at last had two strikers playing up front.
Levein shares a type of wariness and conservatism that seems to be ingrained in Scotland managers stretching back an entire generation. On Levein’s Scotland gravestone it will say: “He chose caution before adventure.”
The Scotland manager is now embattled, bringing much of it on himself. Personally, I like Levein, and admire his sense of conviction, but not when it makes him seem inflexible or pig-headed. He has been called this and a lot more in recent days, sometimes with justification.
Some things Levein just will not live down. On the absence of Steven Fletcher, a £14 million-valued striker, no amount of debate can obscure the fact that Levein, as manager, has been unable to resolve the issue. It remains absurd, and a kick in the teeth to the Tartan Army, that the Sunderland striker has not been involved in this campaign.
Behind the scenes we must hope that Levein has gone the extra mile to try to coax Fletcher back into his squad. But doubts remain that the Scotland manager is too proud to do that. In any case, does it matter now? Probably not.
It is nigh-on impossible to see Scotland turning this campaign around. Wales appear a disaster, losing 6-1 to Serbia, and Scotland might yet get a result in Cardiff. But Serbia, Croatia and Belgium are the group’s clear form horses.
Levein’s competitive record now reads: Played 10, Won 3, Drawn 4, Lost 3.
He is heading for the sack, it pains me to say.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article