They fell just short of making the perfect start in their new, Commonwealth Games medal-chasing collaboration, but for Imogen Bankier and Kirsty Gilmour, the Yonex Welsh International Open provided them with a satisfactory start to their sporting adventure.
Since their target is to pick up maximum ranking points from the limited number of events they have time to enter together ahead of Glasgow 2014 in bidding to gain a top-four seeding, which could make a crucial difference to their chances, the idea was to win the title.
That would also have given them the maximum amount of court time together with five matches in all and they looked well on course when they knocked out the fourth seeds in their opening round and the eighth seeds in the quarter-final.
However, in the semi-final, their fourth match in all, they came a cropper to Australian qualifiers He Tian Tang and Renuga Veeran. Since Bankier and Petya Nedelcheva, her other women's doubles partner with whom she is pursuing European Championship honours earlier this year, had beaten the same pair in the quarter-finals at the Scottish Open Grand Prix the previous week, it was in many ways the ideal measure of where they are at this stage.
"We have mixed emotions," said Bankier, winner of five mixed doubles titles with Robert Blair this season.
"Of course we are both disappointed to lose, but we didn't play our best and it's good to know where we are so we can work on some weaknesses when we get home."
The 2011 world championship silver medallist, in partnership with England's Chris Adcock, is much the more experienced of the pair, but she admits that - having formed her partnership with Bulgarian Nedelcheva this year - she too has much to learn having previously been a mixed doubles specialist.
"I'm becoming more familiar with it now, but I didn't play any ladies doubles after Delhi [the 2010 Commonwealth games] until I started playing with Petya at the beginning of this year, so it's relatively new, but although my strongest event is mixed and Kirsty's is singles we are still serious about our doubles," she said.
"At the moment we don't really know our level so we don't want to pile loads of pressure on ourselves. It's a bit of testing the water and seeing how it goes before we come up with any real clear goals.
"There's definitely an element of whether there's a natural gel or a natural chemistry when you're on court with somebody, but a lot of it is just number of matches. You need to play a lot with someone and train a lot with them, putting in the hours to get the understanding.
"Chemistry's important but it only takes you so far. That's the aim with these tournaments. We should hopefully be seeing a lot of games and it's that match practice that should put us in good stead for next year when we will hopefully play some slightly bigger events against tougher opposition, but you can tell pretty quickly if a partnership has the potential to be good or not."
The signs are good then, with the 20-year-old, albeit jokingly, making it clear that she will not be shy about asserting herself.
"I don't let her get away with creeping up at that net. I want a shot at that," said Gilmour with a cheeky grin, before adding more seriously: "We're both pretty good movers and my strength's at the back of the court while Imogen's is at the net from our respective disciplines, but I think we've worked quite well so far to get ourselves into the right positions."
Having focused on the women's doubles in Wales both will also compete in their recognised specialist disciplines this week before playing solely in the women's doubles again in Italy later this month.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article