RICKY BURNS, the former World Boxing Organisation lightweight champion from Coatbridge, will return to the ring on September 13 in an eight-round non-title contest - probably at light-welterweight - in Manchester on a bill promoted by Eddie Hearn.
The 31-year-old Scot suffered a second successive costly defeat last Friday at Braehead Arena, where he was out-pointed by Dejan Zlaticanin, of Montenegro, for the vacant World Boxing Council International lightweight title. Burns' fourth career loss just four months after he relinquished his world crown to Terence Crawford, of America, put paid to the prospect of challenging WBC champion Omar Figeuroa and a third championship belt.
Hearn is clearly keen to find out what Burns has left in the tank. He has appeared jaded in his four bouts since switching promoters from Frank Warren and the suspicion must be that the prospect of impending court proceedings brought by the London fight promoter, sighting breach of contract, is weighing heavily on the boxer's mind.
Prior to losing to Zlaticanin, Burns' defeat by Crawford was his third performance since coming under Matchroom's promotional banner. His title was very much on the line when he fought Jose Gonzalez in May last year until the Puerto Rican inexplicably quit while ahead on points after nine rounds, complaining of a wrist injury.
In his next defence, four months later, Burns suffered a broken jaw in the second round against Raymundo Beltran, of Mexico, but somehow summoned up the courage to survive the remaining 10 rounds and retain his crown, by dint of a controversial draw, before Crawford subsequently ended his reign.
The Scot's manager, Alex Morrison, who suspects that weight has also become an issue, said yesterday: "Ricky will very probably come back at light-welterweight after I advised him to move up.
"If all goes well, he will then have a fight, in Glasgow, in November or December, for a domestic title of some description. After three indifferent performances there is no way we could bring him back at world level."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article