Ricky Burns' press conference in Glasgow to promote his forthcoming WBO Lightweight title fight against Terence Crawford turned ugly when undercard fighters Stephen Simmons and Wadi Camacho became embroiled in a vitriolic slanging match.
Before the Coatbridge champion takes on the unbeaten American at the SECC in the city on March 1, Simmons will defend his WBC International Silver Cruiserweight title against Camacho but they almost came to blows at the City Halls as the result of a bitter Twitter spat between the pair.
The Scot began haranguing Camacho at the top table, imploring his opponent to "look at me" as he called him a "rat" and promised to send him "home in a coma" amid a relentless series of other insults.
Camacho sat facing the front, sporadically shouting "cookie monster" at the Edinburgh fighter and the traditional head-to-head photographic opportunity became literal as both men pressed foreheads together before being separated by promoter Eddie Hearn.
The Spain-born challenger, who boxes out of Canning Town, then clashed verbally with Simmons for several minutes before order was eventually restored.
Afterwards Hearn said: "There has been a lot of build-up on Twitter and social media and things get personal and what you saw there was a culmination of the hype and the banter that has turned a little bit sour.
"It is two guys who don't really like each other."
The confrontation overshadowed the promotion of Burns' return to the ring for the first time since September when he earned a highly-disputed draw with Ray Beltran, albeit the 30-year-old Scot fought with a broken jaw sustained in round two.
While most observers, as well as Burns, wanted a rematch against the Mexican, Hearn explained they were left with no option but to take on mandatory challenger Crawford.
"Beltran might get his chance in the fight after this fight but Top Rank represent both fighters and they made it clear which fighter they want to fight Ricky Burns," he said.
"Such is Crawford's level, I don't think Ricky can be criticised for not fighting Beltran, it is what he wanted to do but it was not possible.
"Ricky took a lot of unnecessary stick over the Beltran fight. He broke his jaw in round two.
"I felt he lost the fight but he was given a draw. But it is not his fault. He had to endure a tremendous amount of pain during that fight but he got through it.
"Crawford is a much better fighter than Beltran and this is a much tougher fight."
Hearn admits he feared for Burns' future when he saw him lying in hospital nursing his broken jaw.
"When I left hospital that night I was sure that was it for Ricky Burns," he said.
"I don't know what is in a man that makes him want to go back and do it all again.
"That is why fighters are very special. They are tough, tough people.
"Why would he want to go through it again, it is not as if he is struggling for money.
"It's because he is a fighter, that's what he loves to do".
Burns admits he also had some concerns about his future.
He said: "When the surgeons are talking to you, when you see the X-rays, obviously it is going to be in the back of your mind; 'what if I can't fight again, what if it happened again?'
"But once we knew the bone was knitting together, that went out the window.
"The first spar is over with, it has been tested once or twice and the jaw feels fine.
"I have been boxing for 18 years, that was my first serious injury so let's hope it is the last."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article