THe London summer Olympics will cast a long shadow over this week's cycling world championships in Australia.
They are a final opportunity for riders to qualify for the Games but all the riders will have planned their training schedules so they will peak for July, and many will under-perform, at least comparatively, Down Under.
"I'm not sure how much of a marker the world championships will be," says Craig MacLean, the Commonwealth gold medallist and twice silver medallist in the team sprint at the world championships.
"There's still a long way to the Games, people are aiming to peak in London. So it could be that they are going into the worlds having done a mini-taper, and we might not see the best of them.
"There are very few people who have won the worlds and then gone on to win the Olympics, but you'd rather be closer to the podium than further away from it.
"While it will be good for morale to do well, that can be a double-edged sword, because there might then be a tendency to become a little bit complacent."
Having watched the British team perform well at the London World Cup event last month, MacLean believes the riders are capable of building on the success of the Beijing Olympics, where they won 14 medals – eight gold, four silver and two bronze.
MacLean won silver alongside Sir Chris Hoy in the team sprint at the 2000 Olympics in Sydney and he identifies his former partner, who is competing in Australia, as a natural leader.
Hoy's experience and ability to perform at the critical moment will be vital for the British team.
MacLean says: "He's the best athlete I've ever seen. If he's performing well, a lot of his team-mates will take confidence from that."
"It's going to be very difficult to reproduce the haul from Beijing, just because they took so many unexpectedly.
"But I don't think guys like Chris will feel the pressure, they'll use the crowd to their advantage."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article