Team Sky rider Jonathan Tiernan-Locke has withdrawn from racing after being notified of possible discrepancies in his biological passport data by cycling's world governing body the UCI.
Tiernan-Locke, 28, joined Team Sky in January after a successful 2012 which included overall victory at the Tour of Britain. He withdrew from Sunday's road race at the World Championships in Florence, where he had been selected to ride for Great Britain, after receiving the UCI information.
The UCI screens the blood values of riders as part of its efforts to clamp down on doping in the sport. Team Sky have confirmed the data being scrutinised in relation to Tiernan-Locke comes from the period immediately before he joined them from the Endura team. A statement from Team Sky read: "Team Sky has been informed by Jonathan Tiernan-Locke that the UCI has notified him of a potential discrepancy in his biological passport data.
"He has withdrawn from racing whilst his response to the UCI is prepared then considered by the UCI. We have no doubts over his performance, behaviour or tests at Team Sky and understand any anomaly is in readings taken before he joined the team.
"Team Sky has tried to respect what should be a confidential process, allowing the rider to explain in private, without prejudice, and the anti-doping authorities to do their valuable job. At this stage in the ongoing process we will not add any further detail."
A British Cycling spokesman added: "It is not our policy to discuss individual cases until they are concluded and all appeals heard. Until then, information is considered personal and confidential and its release is absolutely at the discretion of the athlete. We remain committed to respecting what should be a confidential process which allows the anti-doping authorities to do their job in the right way and an individual the chance to explain privately and without prejudice."
Newly elected UCI president Brian Cookson, who was able to defeat incumbent Pat McQuaid in Friday's vote after pledging to restore credibility to the sport in the wake of a series of damaging drugs scandals, said yesterday: "I think this absolutely underlines why anti-doping has got to be independent from the UCI and I certainly won't be interfering in this process at all.
"I wouldn't have done when I was British Cycling president and I won't now I'm UCI president. It's important that it is handled properly and with integrity under the processes that are laid down. I am concerned that it has leaked because I don't think this information should be in the public domain while someone is being questioned - that's not the same at all as them being guilty."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article