THE head of Scottish Squash has accused sportscotland of undermining their bid to use the Scottish Government's much-trumpeted CashBack for Communities programme to help disadvantaged areas of the country.
John Dunlop, the chief executive of Scottish Squash and Racketball (SSRL), says he is hugely excited about the future of his sport, despite it been described by sportscotland officials as having "failed" when he was appointed two years ago.
Dunlop has now been left baffled by the decision to end its CashBack support. The money funded a project which exceeded its targets by 95% but that does not appear to have been taken into account in reaching the decision to withdraw the finances.
"SSRL far exceeded anyone's expectations in this project, including mine," said Dunlop. "We overperformed beyond my wildest dreams, but the smoke signals from civil servants were confusing as to whether or not there would be continued funding.
"However, since sportscotland were never supportive of the CashBack scheme, it seems that when they became party to deciding where future CashBack funds were spent, the days of funding were numbered.
"Depressingly, the decision not to take forward the existing CashBack projects was taken without even assessing the projects and, while the sports minister is on record as saying we were told about that decision by the Scottish Sport and Wellbeing Unit, we have never been given the rationale behind stopping it."
Dunlop believes that, regardless of the lack of backing, a great deal of good has come from those aborted projects. He remains committed to implementing the ideas generated by them, describing it as "one of the drivers that indirectly forced SSRL to review its products".
However, Dunlop has called on the government to think again about how it spends CashBack funds.
"Much has been written about what type of school you go to deciding your access to sport," he said. "Disposable income and dedicated parents are probably the drivers that dictate access to sport.
"The CashBack ethos was about creating sporting opportunity for those without funds, disengaged from school, strangers to traditional family structures and to establishment networks. It deserves to be revisited, and quickly."
The whole question of how CashBack for Communities funding is being distributed was raised last week in the Scottish Parliament by former sports minister Patricia Ferguson, who asked the government "whether it will ensure that communities most blighted by crime benefit most from the scheme".
An answer is expected later this month.
Interview. Pages 8-9
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article