GREIG Laidlaw has defended the introduction of John Hardie into Scotland’s Rugby World Cup training camp, arguing that the New Zealander, like other imports, has added competition for places. Hardie, who turned 27 this week, is eligible for Scotland through a grandmother from Fife and was drafted into the squad by national coach Vern Cotter two weeks ago.
The flanker’s selection, like that of so-called project players such as Josh Strauss and WP Nel, has been criticised by some commentators, including former internationals who have argued it sends the wrong message to players who have come up through the system. But Laidlaw said that Scotland were entitled to play by the same eligibility rules as every other country, and argued that bringing in players such as Hardie had strengthened the squad.
“Everybody else does it in terms of looking at players who qualify for their country,” Laidlaw said. “John qualifies to play for Scotland and Vern wants to have a look.
“Vern has said all along that if he's not good enough then he won't play. If he is good then he will play. It's the same throughout the squad.
“If you look through the whole squad, there is competition for places and that can only be a good thing for Scotland. We only have the two pro teams, so the more good players who are up for selection the better. It's the way of the world and if Vern wants to have a look at him and he is Scottish qualified then that's what he's allowed to do.”
Hardie, who celebrated his 27th birthday on Monday, has been a low-key member of the training group so far, according to Laidlaw. “John is a quiet lad and a grafter. He doesn't say much - he just gets on with his work and I think the boys appreciated that. First impression is that he is a good bloke and Vern obviously sees something in him that he wants to have a look at.”
After losing all five games in the Six Nations Championship, the squad have undergone an intense training schedule over the last month and a half - something which Laidlaw hopes will improve their ability to compete from first whistle to last. “I think it had to be like that, coming off the back of a poor Six Nations tournament,” he said. “The main thing to come out of the camp is that we need to develop our skill sets and I think we've done that.
“In the Six Nations we probably played for 50, 60 minutes with a high-quality offloading game that put teams under a bit of strain, I think then we just came up short in the last 20 or 30 minutes, or even the whole second half in a couple of games.
“Training has been tailored towards fixing that. Training has been definitely pushed towards big decision-making and skills under fatigue.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here