Scotland might have to beef up their efforts on the pest control front if they are to have a hope of securing a home win against either France or England in the forthcoming RBS 6 Nations championship.
In the wake of Saturday's 21-15 defeat by Australia, two leading Scottish players have said that the Murrayfield pitch - ravaged by an infestation of parasitic nematode worms for the past three months - had done them no favours as they tried (literally) to get a foothold in the game.
No.8 Dave Denton said that their plan to use the scrum, traditionally an area of weakness for Australia, as their primary attacking weapon was undermined by the state of the pitch. "Our scrum was dominant, but the pitch didn't let us do much with that," said the 23-year-old forward.
And Sean Lamont, who was denied a try at the end of Scotland's best move when he was hauled down a yard short of the line, revealed that the surface had been a factor in his failure to beat the last defender, man-of-the-match Israel Folau.
"I had the angle but you can't really step much on that pitch," said Lamont. "It's a nightmare. Of course the condition of the pitch makes a difference. You always want a firm footing. Unfortunately, there's not much you can do about it.
"You can see what's happening in the scrum. The boys felt we had a dominant scrum and were getting a good hit, but when it came to putting a drive on, the carpet rips up.
But it affects both teams, not just one side. It is disappointing, one of these unlucky things."
However, both players agreed that Scotland had put in a far better performance against the Wallabies than against South Africa six days earlier, when they were beaten 28-0.
Denton said: "We're not far away. This is a game we should have won. We were in there right until the very last minute. Last week was more disappointing because we were out of it very early on, but we have shown in recent games against South Africa and against Australia that we can beat them.
"We need to continue that, but we can't just keep doing the same thing every year. We need to learn from this. I don't want to be in the same position the next time we play them, saying the same things to you. We need to come out on the other side next time."
After a period of experimentation and squad rotation, Denton agreed that the Six Nations would put more focus on winning, but added that there will still be a need to blood new players and expand experience. "There has to be a balance, but from the chat we have had about the Six Nations it is going to be more about winning and getting our strongest team out.
"But this is a long-term plan for us, building up to the World Cup, and you can't not build the base of squad. In modern-day rugby, you can't just play the same team every week because if you do
that you will be in trouble when you get some injuries. Come the Six Nations, it will be more about form but we still need diversity
in the squad."
Worms apart, Lamont admitted that Scotland are still not in the same league as sides such as Australia when it comes to converting chances.
The winger said: "It was a better performance than last weekend but it was the same story - little inaccuracies and a couple of soft tries cost us.
"Our defence was pretty good 99% of the time, but that one per cent is the soft score. That's the difference when you play the top teams - they take their chances and take them well, and we've got to learn to take ours a bit better."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article