Stuart Lancaster has suffered the first major setback of his regime as England head coach after the Rugby Football Union failed in their attempts to recruit Andy Farrell from Saracens.
Lancaster had told the RFU he wanted to retain the interim management team that helped guide England to second place in the RBS 6 Nations.
While Graham Rowntree, the forwards coach, is already on the Twickenham payroll, the RFU had been in negotiations with Saracens over Farrell's release for the last fortnight. Ed Griffiths, the club's chief executive, wanted to avoid the issue becoming a distraction over the closing weeks of the season and announced yesterday that Farrell had decided to remain with the club.
"It has been a special privilege for me to be involved in the Saracens coaching staff for the past two-and-a-half seasons," Farrell said in a statement. "We have made decent progress during this period but, in truth, as a club, we have barely scratched the surface of our potential. The job isn't anywhere near half done, and I have decided I want to help finish the job."
Lancaster must now decide how to replace him in time for England's three-Test summer tour of South Africa. Wayne Smith, the attack specialist who helped New Zealand win the 2011 Rugby World Cup, is a strong candidate having already expressed an interest in working with England, but he is unavailable until after the summer tour, while Brian Ashton and Mike Catt, the London Irish attack coach, have both been linked.
"We fully respect [Farrell's] wishes to continue as a coach at Saracens," said Ian Ritchie, the RFU chief executive. "We will continue to work hard with Stuart Lancaster to build a world-class coaching team."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article