As he offered a blunt critique of what he encountered on taking over as Edinburgh's head coach, Alan Solomons yesterday hinted at deep failings within Scottish rugby's headquarters.
Ever since starting in the job, the South African has said that he, his management team and, as a consequence, the playing squad he has taken charge of, are playing catch up with their rivals.
However, the detailed explanation of why that is, which he offered, suggested that they have uncovered some major problems.
"The functional part of the conditioning is busy going in at the moment because there was no functional conditioning done prior to the arrival of Omar [Mouneimne, the assistant he brought with him from Super 15's Southern Kings]," he said.
"That's no reflection on any of the conditioning that was done before [this summer] because that wasn't the brief. The brief was to put in some base fitness and Neil Potts [the SRU's head of fitness and conditioning] did an excellent job, but from a coaching perspective particularly the defence and the breakdown, you need that functional conditioning."
By which he means what is more commonly thought of as match fitness in terms of readiness and ability to react to what confronts players in game situations and, on the face of it, his comments could be interpreted as simply reflecting the lateness of his and Mouneimne's arrival in camp.
Solomons added: "Put it this way, I can't comment on what's been happening here in the past but from a functional conditioning perspective we needed work.
"But I think you've got to back, as I understood it - and I wasn't here - that the science conditioning left a great deal to be desired full stop."
"That is absolutely fundamental and what would normally have after that period is the coaching transfer's over. Obviously what we will do when we have a full pre-season together is that will be completely integrated."
Plenty of caveats in there designed to avoid apportioning blame to anyone presently on the SRU staff, but the reality is that if his assessment is right, a great deal seems not have been done properly within the professional team that plays on the governing body's front lawn and which contains many Scotland internationalists.
Given the experience of the past decade or so it would, meanwhile, be understandable if those of a cynical disposition interpreted these comments as merely the latest attempt by an in-coming coach to buy additional time for himself by casting aspersions upon the previous regime.
Certainly all the available evidence is that Solomons is likely to need as much time as he can get to turn things around at the club that is separated from its Scottish rivals Glasgow Warriors by the full length of the league table.
Given the rapidity with which successive SRU regimes have discarded professional coaches over the years there is no guarantee of that. However, if Solomons is the right man for the job, as most believe the tried and tested trouble-shooter to be, the current SRU hierarchy are under additional pressure to give him extra breathing space.
They, after all, took full ownership of his appointment only a few weeks ago so have little choice but to accept his assessment of what he found when he arrived.
To frustrated supporters who were muted as the side slumped to a home defeat to the Scarlets last weekend, none of that will offer much in the way of solace at the time of the season when, as evidenced by the Cardiff line-up for tomorrow's match, most teams are getting up to full strength.
Furthermore, given all the conditioning work they are still undertaking, Solomons warned them not to expect miracles of their own leading players such as Greig Laidlaw, the captain who makes his first competitive appearance of the season tomorrow and Matt Scott who is set to do likewise from the bench.
With the Heineken Cup just a week away, his essential message was that any further wins before the end of October will fit very much into the bonus camp.
There will, this season, be no repeat of the Heineken Cup heroics of two years ago and it looks as if it may be some time before they start to clamber their way up the RaboDirect Pro12 table.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article