NEW YORK, Friday
THE last graffiti-covered subway train in New York city quietly went
out of service today, ending an era of spray cans and screeching egos
that drove many New Yorkers to despair.
A ceremony to mark the train's last journey to the scrap heap of
history was cancelled by the Metropolitan Transit Authority because of
the death this week of a top city official, Schools Chancellor Richard
Greene.
But it is not quite goodbye to ''Taki 137'' and the tens of thousands
of other teenagers who sought an odd kind of immortality since the late
1960s by spray-painting New York underground trains with their names,
their friends' names, cryptic messages and billowing chartreuse
balloons.
There are still hundreds of subway stations that bear the marks of New
York's ''Graffiti artists'' and above ground there are tens of thousands
of buildings that bear the markings of what some call ''people's art.''
There is even a ''Graffiti Museum'' in lower Manhattan that sells
works by graffiti artists and their sketch books.
But graffiti is gone from the 6245 cars operated by the New York City
Transit Authority which are used by three million passengers a day.
All of the subway cars have either been replaced, gutted and rebuilt
or scrubbed clean as a result of a five-year programme that at its
height used 1000 workers.
Spokesmen for the Transit Authority said that now all the cars are
clean and if one is marked up, it will be pulled out of service and
cleaned within 24 hours before being allowed back on the tracks.
''Graffiti on the walls or subway stations create bad karma,'' said
Mayor Edward Koch earlier this week.
The graffiti, often covering every inch of a train, gave an eerie feel
to subway riding in New York, almost like sitting in the inside of
someone's dustbin. The messages were random and sometimes violent
although seldom political or racial.--Reuter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article