BRITAIN should seek an opt-out from the European Birds Directive to allow Scottish grouse moor owners to cull the threatened hen harriers which prey on young grouse, the chairman of the Game Conservancy Trust's Scottish committee said yesterday.
Philip Astor, owner of a grouse moor in Aberdeenshire, said if there was a failure of other methods, such as experiments with supplementary feeding of hen harriers with rabbit carcasses during their breeding season, then the UK should seek a derogation from the EU law.
This would allow quotas of hen harriers, which carry the highest national and international protection but are now Britain's most persecuted raptor, to be established on grouse moors. Mr Astor suggested a figure of one pair of the birds in an area of six to eight thousand acres would be equitable.
He acknowledged the current illegal killing of the raptors by grouse moor gamekeepers was unacceptable but claimed his suggested management scheme, with the ''quota'' birds being better protected, would result in the current 500 pairs of hen harriers in Scotland actually increasing.
The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Scotland said they were strongly of the view that derogation was not a possibility and Mr Astor's idea was ''a false hope''.
The Scottish Landowners' Federation said it was ''a step too far at this stage'' and distanced themselves from the concept.
Mr Astor was speaking after the signing of a historic statement of intent to conserve and manage wildlife-rich moorlands. Signatories from 24 organisations representing gamekeepers, landowners and managers, and conservation groups endorsed the work of the moorland working group chaired by SNH.
A Scottish Executive spokes-man said it deplored the continuing persecution of raptors and proposed to introduce deterrent measures, including custodial sentences, as soon as possible.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article