THE Crown Office has ordered an investigation into the deaths of two women after their illnesses were allegedly misdiagnosed by hospital staff.
They died of brain haemorrhages after scans at Wishaw General, Lanarkshire. Hazel Ferguson's death took place in November 2001. A post-mortem examination revealed the 35-year-old mother-of-one from Wishaw had died of the haemorrhage, but the circumstances were such that the procurator-fiscal was concerned there could be more victims.
She spoke to fiscals elsewhere in Lanarkshire to establish if other deaths had been linked to Computerised To-mography (CT) scans at the hospital.
It was then revealed that three months before Mrs Ferguson's death, Catherine Dishington, a 55-year-old woman from Coatbridge, died in similar circumstances. A fatal accident inquiry will now be held into whether staff at the hospital failed to establish what was wrong with both women.
Mrs Ferguson was an in-patient at the time, while Mrs Dishington, who had two children and three grandchildren died at home.
The Crown Office said: ''These were two quite separate deaths some time apart. The procurator-fiscal investigating one death made some checks with colleagues and it was then that the circumstances of the other death came to light.''
Mrs Dishington's husband, Gordon, said his solicitor told him his wife's death was being linked to that of another woman. ''Other than that, I don't know anything about the other woman's circumstances.''
The hospital stated: ''As this case is currently subject to a inquiry, we are unable to comment at this stage. However, we have been and will continue to co-operate fully with the procurator-fiscal's office re-garding any information they require.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article