NURSES were poised to tear up their long-standing no-strike rule after
Ministers yesterday refused to back down on controversial local pay
deals.
Junior Health Minister Baroness Cumberlege was booed and heckled by
members of the Royal College of Nursing meeting in Harrogate for their
annual congress, when she claimed that local pay bargaining was here to
stay.
However, the settlement appears likely to set off industrial action by
some 900,000 NHS workers.
Furious delegates shouted ''rubbish'' as the baroness, a former
vice-president of the RCN, repeated Government claims that nurses were
not being short-changed. She was jeered when she said: ''I do believe
the future is in local pay -- that is the way forward.''
She particularly infuriated RCN members by saying that in Derby, where
local pay has been introduced, nurses have had offers of between 3% and
9%. She was heckled repeatedly during a 45-minute question and answer
session.
This was in stark contrast to fellow panel member Christine Hancock,
the RCN's general secretary, who was greeted with loud cheers and
applause.
Around a dozen trusts have made offers of 1% and many have made offers
conditional on improving sickness absence rates or scrapping bank
holiday payments.
The mood of the conference was such that delegates appear certain to
vote today to scrap the RCN's traditional no-strike rule and replace it
with one allowing limited action.
This would then go to a ballot next month which would require a
two-thirds majority for the rule change to be endorsed. There would then
require to be a legal industrial action ballot before action could be
taken.
The scale of the hostility displayed the nurses' anger at not
receiving a 3% across-the-board national pay rise and being asked to
accept local bargaining to stand any chance of improving on a
''miserly'' 1% national offer. Even then, in many cases efficiency
''strings'' are being demanded by NHS trusts.
Consultations among the 440,000 Unison members employed in the NHS,
including 240,000 nurses, end tomorrow and are understood to be running
heavily in favour of industrial action in protest at broadly similar 1%
central offers. Industrial action ballots are likely to be set in train
soon.
Baroness Cumberlege admitted that some trusts might not be able to
offer 3% this year, if they were in financial difficulties. But she
claimed it was up to nurses to negotiate -- adding that it was not in
trusts' interests to have demoralised staff.
Earlier yesterday, in her presidential address to the RCN congress,
Mrs Betty Kershaw warned Ministers involved in the nurses' pay battle:
''You've seen nothing yet,'' and spoke of the the ''deep sense of
outrage'' felt by nurses over the ''mismanagement'' of their pay award.
This had been fuelled by the knowledge that nurses, more than any
other health workers, had helped improve health service productivity and
raised standards of care, she claimed.
In a rousing speech before 2000 delegates, she accused the Government
of a serious error of judgment.
''By ignoring the evidence, by ignoring the anger of nurses, and by
underestimating the support of the public for nurses, the Government
have made a very grave mistake,'' she declared.
Nurses had been dealt a body blow but had got off the floor to fight
for a fair deal, Mrs Kershaw said. If they failed to win 3%, it would be
the Government that would not recover.
She ended with a defiant message for the Prime Minister, Health
Secretary Virginia Bottomley, and Health Minister Gerry Malone.
''We will fight for nursing and for the health services of this
country, to ensure that our campaign marks a turning point for nursing,
and to use the tremendous support we have received to create a better
future. We will fight to win this battle and move on to win the war.''
Pay gulf11
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article